Lithium Ion

Lithium Ion

SCHEMBL3760441

CCn1c(C(=O)[O-])cc2nc(OC)ccc21.[Li+]

nearest known ligand 0.45

Full drug profile on Sugi Atlas →

Known targets — ChEMBL curated mechanism

GSK3AGSK3BIMPA1

The experimentally established mechanism targets of Lithium Ion. The predicted profile below is derived independently by chemical similarity — agreement is a validation signal, a miss is honest.

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
KDM4E B2RXH2 2/20 0.45
TDP1 Q9NUW8 2/20 0.44
KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.41
MAPT P10636 4/20 0.39
NPC1 O15118 2/20 0.39
NLRP3 Q96P20 1/20 0.39
LMNA P02545 2/20 0.39
HTT P42858 2/20 0.39
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.39
RAB9A P51151 3/20 0.38
ACSS2 Q9NR19 1/20 0.37
GAA P10253 3/20 0.37
PTGER4 P35408 1/20 0.36
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.36
MTNR1A P48039 1/20 0.36
MTNR1B P49286 1/20 0.36
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.36
HDAC1 Q13547 1/20 0.36
HDAC8 Q9BY41 1/20 0.36
POLB P06746 1/20 0.36

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL3760444 0.85 GPR35 (0.47) KDM4ETDP1KMT2AMAPTNPC1
SCHEMBL3752568 0.85 KDM4E (0.55) KDM4ETDP1KMT2AMAPTNPC1
SCHEMBL6964777 0.67 CCR2 (0.49) TDP1MAPTPTGER4
SCHEMBL5716679 0.64 HDAC3 (0.51) KDM4EKMT2AMAPTLMNAHTT
SCHEMBL1731129 0.62 KDM4E (1.00) KDM4ETDP1KMT2AMAPTNPC1
SCHEMBL3750423 0.62 GPR35 (0.58) KDM4EHPGDACSS2SMN1; SMN2POLB
SCHEMBL24688398 0.61 KDM4E (0.74) KDM4EKMT2AMAPTNPC1NLRP3
SCHEMBL31617371 0.61 ALDH3A1 (0.50) KDM4ELMNAHTTHPGDGAA
SCHEMBL700814 0.61 KDM4E (0.67) KDM4ETDP1HPGDSMN1; SMN2MTNR1A
SCHEMBL21496245 0.60 TLR8 (0.46) TDP1MAPTHTTGAASMN1; SMN2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 1 patent. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20100305093-A1 Inhibitors of mTOR and Methods of Making and Using EXELIXIS, INC. (US) 2010-12-02 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100305093-A1 Inhibitors of mTOR and Methods of Making and Using MTOR, RICTOR, RPTOR KDM4E 718/4885TDP1 3588/4885KMT2A 3940/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.