SCHEMBL3782360

SCHEMBL3782360

Cc1nc2nc(S(=O)(=O)Nc3ccccc3S(=O)(=O)N(C)C)nn2c2c1CCC2

nearest known ligand 0.44

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
HTR6 P50406 6/20 0.44
HTR2B P41595 2/20 0.42
KCNH2 Q12809 1/20 0.38
KDM4E B2RXH2 2/20 0.35
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 2/20 0.34
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.34
NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.34
HCRTR1 O43613 1/20 0.34
GAA P10253 1/20 0.34
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.34
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.34
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.34
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.34
SLC40A1 Q9NP59 1/20 0.33
INSR P06213 1/20 0.33
ALK Q9UM73 1/20 0.33
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.33
POLB P06746 1/20 0.33
RECQL P46063 1/20 0.33
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.33

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL3783885 0.78 LMNA (0.54) KDM4EALDH1A1TSHRSMN1; SMN2MEN1
SCHEMBL3776678 0.69 LMNA (0.56) KDM4EALDH1A1GAATSHRSMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL3772469 0.69 TSHR (0.56) ALDH1A1GAATSHRSMN1; SMN2MEN1
SCHEMBL3769726 0.68 AXL (0.37) SLC40A1INSRALK
SCHEMBL3779103 0.64 TSHR (0.47) ALDH1A1TSHRSMN1; SMN2POLBKMT2A
SCHEMBL3778132 0.63 TSHR (0.54) KDM4EALDH1A1TSHRSMN1; SMN2MEN1
SCHEMBL13404825 0.60 L3MBTL1 (0.50) HTR6HTR2BKCNH2KDM4EL3MBTL1
SCHEMBL8373695 0.60 POLB (0.38) ALDH1A1NPC1RAB9ATSHRMEN1
SCHEMBL9832384 0.60 TSHR (0.58) KDM4EALDH1A1GAATSHRSMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL3775303 0.60 EDNRA (0.34) SLC40A1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 11 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-2234993-B1 BIS- (SULF ONYLAMINO) DERIVATIVES FOR USE IN THERAPY ASTRAZENECA AB (SE) 2012-11-07 EP claimed
US-20100331321-A1 Bis-(Sulfonylamino) derivatives for use in therapy ASTRAZENECA AB (SE) 2010-12-30 US claimed
EP-2234993-A1 BIS- (SULF ONYLAMINO) DERIVATIVES FOR USE IN THERAPY AstraZeneca AB (SE) 2010-10-06 EP claimed
WO-2009082347-A1 BIS- (SULF ONYLAMINO) DERIVATIVES FOR USE IN THERAPY ASTRAZENECA AB (SE) 2009-07-02 WO claimed
US-20090163586-A1 Bis-(Sulfonylamino) Derivatives in Therapy 205 ASTRAZENECA AB (SE) 2009-06-25 US claimed
US-9145380-B2 Bis-(sulfonylamino) derivatives for use in therapy ASTRAZENECA AB (SE) 2015-09-29 US disclosed
EP-2234993-B1 BIS- (SULF ONYLAMINO) DERIVATIVES FOR USE IN THERAPY ASTRAZENECA AB (SE) 2012-11-07 EP disclosed
US-20100331321-A1 Bis-(Sulfonylamino) derivatives for use in therapy ASTRAZENECA AB (SE) 2010-12-30 US disclosed
EP-2234993-A1 BIS- (SULF ONYLAMINO) DERIVATIVES FOR USE IN THERAPY AstraZeneca AB (SE) 2010-10-06 EP disclosed
WO-2009082347-A1 BIS- (SULF ONYLAMINO) DERIVATIVES FOR USE IN THERAPY ASTRAZENECA AB (SE) 2009-07-02 WO disclosed
US-20090163586-A1 Bis-(Sulfonylamino) Derivatives in Therapy 205 ASTRAZENECA AB (SE) 2009-06-25 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090163586-A1 Bis-(Sulfonylamino) Derivatives in Therapy 205 PTGER1, SULT2A1, SULT1E1 HTR6 1701/4885HTR2B 667/4885KCNH2 3620/4885
US-20100331321-A1 Bis-(Sulfonylamino) derivatives for use in therapy PTGER1, SULT2A1, SULT1E1 HTR6 1111/4885HTR2B 523/4885KCNH2 3262/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.