SCHEMBL4136377

SCHEMBL4136377

CN(C)C(=O)c1cccc(-c2ccc3c(c2)CCC(N2CCCC2)C3)c1

nearest known ligand 0.52

Predicted protein targets (top 16)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
HRH3 Q9Y5N1 1/20 0.52
OTUD7B Q6GQQ9 3/20 0.43
ERN1 O75460 1/20 0.42
DAGLA Q9Y4D2 1/20 0.41
KEAP1 Q14145 3/20 0.41
NFE2L2 Q16236 3/20 0.41
MCHR1 Q99705 1/20 0.41
BRD4 O60885 1/20 0.40
CREBBP Q92793 1/20 0.40
BCHE P06276 1/20 0.40
L3MBTL3 Q96JM7 1/20 0.40
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.40
HCRTR2 O43614 1/20 0.40
KDM2B Q8NHM5 2/20 0.40
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.40
PDK2 Q15119 1/20 0.40

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL4136371 1.00 HRH3 (0.52) HRH3OTUD7BERN1DAGLAKEAP1
SCHEMBL4136231 0.90 HRH3 (0.45) HRH3OTUD7BERN1KEAP1NFE2L2
SCHEMBL4143084 0.90 KCNH2 (0.47) HRH3OTUD7BMCHR1L3MBTL3L3MBTL1
SCHEMBL4141092 0.90 BCHE (0.44) HRH3MCHR1BCHEL3MBTL3L3MBTL1
SCHEMBL4142089 0.89 HRH3 (0.42) HRH3OTUD7BERN1KEAP1NFE2L2
SCHEMBL4148572 0.88 AKR1C3 (0.43) HRH3OTUD7BERN1KEAP1NFE2L2
SCHEMBL4141778 0.88 HRH3 (0.41) HRH3MCHR1BCHEL3MBTL3L3MBTL1
SCHEMBL4128788 0.88 HRH3 (0.49) HRH3MCHR1L3MBTL3L3MBTL1
SCHEMBL4133418 0.86 L3MBTL3 (0.51) MCHR1L3MBTL3L3MBTL1
SCHEMBL4140118 0.85 TDP2 (0.45) HRH3ERN1L3MBTL3L3MBTL1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20090163482-A1 TETRALINES ANTAGONISTS OF THE H-3 RECEPTOR MCHARDY STANTON FURST 2009-06-25 US claimed
EP-2007749-A2 TETRALINES ANTAGONISTS OF THE H-3 RECEPTOR Pfizer Products Inc. (US) 2008-12-31 EP claimed
WO-2007105053-A2 TETRALINES ANTAGONISTS OF THE H-3 RECEPTOR PFIZER PRODUCTS INC. (US) 2007-09-20 WO claimed
US-20090163482-A1 TETRALINES ANTAGONISTS OF THE H-3 RECEPTOR MCHARDY STANTON FURST 2009-06-25 US disclosed
EP-2007749-A2 TETRALINES ANTAGONISTS OF THE H-3 RECEPTOR Pfizer Products Inc. (US) 2008-12-31 EP disclosed
WO-2007105053-A2 TETRALINES ANTAGONISTS OF THE H-3 RECEPTOR PFIZER PRODUCTS INC. (US) 2007-09-20 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090163482-A1 TETRALINES ANTAGONISTS OF THE H-3 RECEPTOR HRH3, HRH4, HRH1 HRH3 1/4885OTUD7B 1717/4885ERN1 4493/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.