SCHEMBL4184912

SCHEMBL4184912

O=C(Nc1cccc(C(=O)Nc2c(Br)cc(C(F)(C(F)(F)F)C(F)(F)F)cc2S(=O)(=O)C(F)(F)F)c1)c1ccccc1

nearest known ligand 0.48

Predicted protein targets (top 14)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ KCNK3 O14649 5/20 0.48
▸ KMT2A Q03164 7/20 0.45
▸ MEN1 O00255 6/20 0.45
▸ LMNA P02545 3/20 0.45
▸ MAPT P10636 3/20 0.45
▸ KCNK9 Q9NPC2 4/20 0.45
▸ TP53 P04637 1/20 0.44
▸ PARP1 P09874 1/20 0.43
▸ NPC1 O15118 2/20 0.42
▸ RAB9A P51151 2/20 0.42
▸ HPGD P15428 1/20 0.42
▸ POLB P06746 1/20 0.41
▸ RXFP1 Q9HBX9 1/20 0.41
▸ P2RX1 P51575 1/20 0.41

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL13875615 0.86 KCNK3 (0.50) KCNK3KMT2AMEN1LMNAMAPT
SCHEMBL1766416 0.83 MAPT (0.57) KCNK3KMT2AMEN1LMNAMAPT
SCHEMBL4185079 0.83 NR1H3 (0.39) KMT2AMEN1LMNAMAPTTP53
SCHEMBL1767376 0.83 KCNK3 (0.54) KCNK3KMT2AMEN1LMNAMAPT
SCHEMBL4175364 0.81 KCNK3 (0.49) KCNK3KMT2AMEN1LMNAMAPT
SCHEMBL4187134 0.81 KCNK3 (0.49) KCNK3KMT2AMEN1LMNAMAPT
SCHEMBL29550438 0.80 P2RX1 (0.41) KCNK3LMNAMAPTKCNK9NPC1
SCHEMBL1766433 0.79 MAPT (0.54) KCNK3KMT2AMEN1LMNAMAPT
SCHEMBL12570375 0.78 KCNK3 (0.59) KCNK3KMT2AMEN1LMNAMAPT
SCHEMBL29409938 0.78 KCNK3 (0.59) KCNK3KMT2AMEN1LMNAMAPT

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 1 patent. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20090099204-A1 Amide derivative, insecticide containing the same and method for application thereof as insecticide MITSUI CHEMICALS, INC. (JP) 2009-04-16 — — US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090099204-A1 Amide derivative, insecticide containing the same and method for application thereof as insecticide CYP2E1, GSTA1, CYP2S1 KCNK3 504/4885KMT2A 499/4885MEN1 4524/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback