Cadaverine Tartrate

Cadaverine Tartrate

SCHEMBL4206534

NC1CCc2ccccc21.O=C(O)C(O)C(O)C(=O)O

nearest known ligand 0.54

Full drug profile on Sugi Atlas →

Known targets — ChEMBL curated mechanism

ADRA1AADRA1BADRA1DADRA2AADRA2BADRA2CADRB1ADRB2ADRB3CHRM1CHRM2CHRM3CHRM4ESR1ESR2GABRA1GABRB1GABRG2GBA1HRH1HTR1DHTR2AOPRD1OPRK1OPRM1SLC6A2SLC6A3TUBA1ATUBA1BTUBA1CTUBA3CTUBA3ETUBA4ATUBBTUBB1TUBB2ATUBB2BTUBB3TUBB4ATUBB4BTUBB6TUBB8rplArplBrplCrplDrplErplFrplJrplKrplLrplMrplNrplOrplPrplQrplRrplSrplTrplUrplVrplWrplXrplYrpmArpmBrpmCrpmDrpmErpmFrpmGrpmHrpmIrpmJrpsArpsBrpsCrpsDrpsErpsFrpsGrpsHrpsIrpsJrpsKrpsLrpsMrpsNrpsOrpsPrpsQrpsRrpsSrpsTrpsUykgMykgO

The experimentally established mechanism targets of Cadaverine Tartrate. The predicted profile below is derived independently by chemical similarity — agreement is a validation signal, a miss is honest.

Predicted protein targets (top 5)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
TRPM8 Q7Z2W7 1/20 0.44
ANPEP P15144 3/20 0.44
ACHE P22303 1/20 0.42
IDO1 P14902 2/20 0.41
PIN1 Q13526 1/20 0.41

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
Cadaverine Tartrate SCHEMBL17727764 1.00 TRPM8 (0.44) TRPM8ANPEPACHEIDO1PIN1
Cadaverine Tartrate SCHEMBL17727763 1.00 TRPM8 (0.44) TRPM8ANPEPACHEIDO1PIN1
Oxalic Acid SCHEMBL6525947 0.86 ANPEP (0.49) TRPM8ANPEPIDO1PIN1
Acetic Acid SCHEMBL27686861 0.85 ANPEP (0.47) TRPM8ANPEPACHEIDO1PIN1
Malic Acid SCHEMBL17941669 0.84 FFAR1 (0.44) TRPM8
Bicarbonate SCHEMBL5368111 0.83 ANPEP (0.46) TRPM8ANPEPIDO1PIN1
SCHEMBL42279 0.82 IDO1 (0.55) ANPEPIDO1
SCHEMBL29395342 0.82 IDO1 (0.55) ANPEPIDO1
SCHEMBL6600 0.82 IDO1 (0.55) ANPEPIDO1
SCHEMBL28840240 0.82 IDO1 (0.55) ANPEPIDO1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1954667-B1 METHODS FOR ISOLATING PROPARGYLATED AMINOINDANS TEVA PHARMA (IL) 2017-02-08 EP disclosed
US-7491847-B2 Methods for isolating propargylated aminoindans TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD. (IL) 2009-02-17 US disclosed
EP-1954667-A2 METHODS FOR ISOLATING PROPARGYLATED AMINOINDANS Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd (IL) 2008-08-13 EP disclosed
WO-2007061717-A2 METHODS FOR ISOLATING PROPARGYLATED AMINOINDANS TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD. (IL) 2007-05-31 WO disclosed
US-20070112217-A1 Methods for isolating propargylated aminoindans TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD. (IL) 2007-05-17 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20070112217-A1 Methods for isolating propargylated aminoindans AAAS, AGT, ARL1 TRPM8 3665/4885ANPEP 44/4885ACHE 1083/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.