SCHEMBL4409640

SCHEMBL4409640

CC(C)OC(=O)[C@H](C)N(C(=O)c1c(Cl)cc(NC(=O)c2cc(CN(C)C=O)ccc2N)cc1Cl)c1ccccc1

nearest known ligand 0.34

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
ITGB1 P05556 8/20 0.34
ITGA4 P13612 8/20 0.34
FADS1 O60427 4/20 0.33
POLB P06746 1/20 0.32
DHODH Q02127 1/20 0.32
ROCK2 O75116 1/20 0.32
HDAC3 O15379 1/20 0.32
BRAF P15056 1/20 0.32
HDAC4 P56524 1/20 0.32
HDAC1 Q13547 1/20 0.32
HDAC7 Q8WUI4 1/20 0.32
HDAC2 Q92769 1/20 0.32
HDAC10 Q969S8 1/20 0.32
HDAC11 Q96DB2 1/20 0.32
HDAC8 Q9BY41 1/20 0.32
HDAC6 Q9UBN7 1/20 0.32
HDAC9 Q9UKV0 1/20 0.32
HDAC5 Q9UQL6 1/20 0.32
SMO Q99835 1/20 0.32
GAA P10253 1/20 0.32

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL295993 0.74 SMN1; SMN2 (0.37) POLBMAPTALDH1A1LMNAKMT2A
SCHEMBL4321203 0.70 ITGB1 (0.60) ITGB1ITGA4
SCHEMBL1322661 0.70 SMN1; SMN2 (0.39) ITGB1ITGA4POLBMAPTALDH1A1
SCHEMBL297623 0.66 ALDH1A1 (0.58) POLBHDAC3HDAC1HDAC2GAA
SCHEMBL12123722 0.65 ITGB1 (0.48) ITGB1ITGA4
SCHEMBL297337 0.65 ALDH1A1 (0.64) GAAMAPTALDH1A1LMNAKMT2A
SCHEMBL12123729 0.64 ITGB1 (0.46) ITGB1ITGA4
SCHEMBL3163947 0.63 ITGB1 (0.41) ITGB1ITGA4ALDH1A1LMNA
SCHEMBL6641198 0.59 ATM (0.44) POLBGAAMAPTALDH1A1KMT2A
SCHEMBL4315764 0.58 ITGB1 (0.52) ITGB1ITGA4

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8546610-B2 Method for preparing phenylalanine derivatives having quinazoline-dione skeleton and intermediates for use in the preparation of the derivatives AJINOMOTO CO., INC. (JP) 2013-10-01 US disclosed
US-20110313154-A1 METHOD FOR PREPARING PHENYLALANINE DERIVATIVES HAVING QUINAZOLINE-DIONE SKELETON AND INTERMEDIATES FOR USE IN THE PREPARATION OF THE DERIVATIVES AJINOMOTO CO., INC. (JP) 2011-12-22 US disclosed
US-20090318688-A1 METHOD FOR PREPARING PHENYLALANINE DERIVATIVES HAVING QUINAZOLINE-DIONE SKELETON AND INTERMEDIATES FOR USE IN THE PREPARATION OF DERIVATIVES AJINOMOTO CO., INC. (JP) 2009-12-24 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090318688-A1 METHOD FOR PREPARING PHENYLALANINE DERIVATIVES HAVING QUINAZOLINE-DIONE SKELETON AND INTERMEDIATES FOR USE IN THE PREPARATION OF DERIVATIVES PAH, DDC, AADAT ITGB1 4840/4885ITGA4 4848/4885FADS1 411/4885
US-20110313154-A1 METHOD FOR PREPARING PHENYLALANINE DERIVATIVES HAVING QUINAZOLINE-DIONE SKELETON AND INTERMEDIATES FOR USE IN THE PREPARATION OF THE DERIVATIVES PAH, DDC, ASNS ITGB1 4852/4885ITGA4 4857/4885FADS1 321/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.