SCHEMBL4516107

SCHEMBL4516107

C[N+](C)(C)CCOCCOCCS.Cc1ccc(S(=O)(=O)[O-])cc1

nearest known ligand 0.42

Known targets — ChEMBL curated mechanism

CHRM1CHRM2CHRM3CHRM4CHRM5SLC6A2dacAdacBdacCftsImrcAmrcBmrdA

The experimentally established mechanism targets of None. The predicted profile below is derived independently by chemical similarity — agreement is a validation signal, a miss is honest.

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
ALDH1A1 P00352 5/20 0.42
LMNA P02545 4/20 0.39
CYP2D6 P10635 2/20 0.39
CYP3A4 P08684 2/20 0.39
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.39
THPO P40225 1/20 0.39
HTT P42858 4/20 0.35
GAA P10253 3/20 0.35
KCNH2 Q12809 2/20 0.35
CYP2C9 P11712 2/20 0.35
CYP2C19 P33261 2/20 0.35
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.35
HIF1A Q16665 1/20 0.35
CA12 O43570 1/20 0.33
CA1 P00915 1/20 0.33
CA2 P00918 1/20 0.33
CA3 P07451 1/20 0.33
CA6 P23280 1/20 0.33
CA5A P35218 1/20 0.33
CA7 P43166 1/20 0.33

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL4525396 0.98 ALDH1A1 (0.43) ALDH1A1LMNACYP2D6CYP3A4MAPK1
SCHEMBL4516113 0.87 CYP1A2 (0.42) ALDH1A1LMNACYP2D6CYP3A4MAPK1
SCHEMBL4525399 0.85 ALDH1A1 (0.42) ALDH1A1LMNACYP2D6CYP3A4MAPK1
SCHEMBL30354180 0.80 ALDH1A1 (0.42) ALDH1A1LMNACYP2D6CYP3A4MAPK1
SCHEMBL16592455 0.78 THRB (0.42) ALDH1A1LMNACYP2D6CYP3A4MAPK1
SCHEMBL1262968 0.77 LMNA (0.40) ALDH1A1LMNACYP2D6CYP3A4MAPK1
SCHEMBL14948194 0.75 CHRM5 (0.36) LMNACYP2D6MAPK1GAACYP2C19
SCHEMBL9182298 0.75 CHRNB4 (0.48) LMNACYP2D6CYP3A4MAPK1THPO
Acetylcholine SCHEMBL14840380 0.75 CHRM1 (0.58) ALDH1A1LMNACYP2D6CYP3A4MAPK1
SCHEMBL11725693 0.74 LMNA (0.50) ALDH1A1LMNACYP2D6CYP3A4MAPK1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20090099044-A1 Nanoparticles and Method to Control Nanoparticle Spacing OREGON, UNIVERSITY OF 2009-04-16 US disclosed
WO-2006127675-A2 NANOPARTICLES AND METHOD TO CONTROL NANOPARTICLE SPACING STATE OF OREGON ACTING BY & THROUGH THE STATE BOARD OF HIGHER EDUCATION ON BEHALF OF THE UNIVERSITY OF OREGON (US) 2006-11-30 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090099044-A1 Nanoparticles and Method to Control Nanoparticle Spacing ICAM1, L1CAM, EPCAM ALDH1A1 271/4885LMNA 4647/4885CYP2D6 1593/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.