Predicted protein targets (top 2)
Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.
Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules
Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.
| Compound | similarity | top predicted | shared targets | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHEMBL45926 | 0.93 | TSHR (0.31) | — | |
| SCHEMBL19139500 | 0.92 | LMNA (0.30) | LMNAHSD17B10 | |
| SCHEMBL46244 | 0.91 | — | — | |
| SCHEMBL37377 | 0.88 | — | — | |
| SCHEMBL12071046 | 0.87 | MEN1 (0.32) | — | |
| SCHEMBL46036 | 0.86 | MEN1 (0.32) | — | |
| SCHEMBL45968 | 0.86 | MEN1 (0.30) | — | |
| SCHEMBL46033 | 0.86 | SMN1; SMN2 (0.31) | — | |
| SCHEMBL12071667 | 0.86 | TSHR (0.31) | — | |
| SCHEMBL46113 | 0.85 | LMNA (0.32) | LMNAHSD17B10 |
Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.
Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them
Claimed or disclosed in 21 patents — showing the first 20. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.
| Patent | Title | Assignee | Published | Priority | Filing | Country | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| US-9485989-B2 | Method of controlling neonicotinoid resistant hemiptera | SYNGENTA PARTICIPATIONS AG (CH) | 2016-11-08 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| US-9485989-B2 | Method of controlling neonicotinoid resistant hemiptera | SYNGENTA PARTICIPATIONS AG (CH) | 2016-11-08 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| US-9462808-B2 | Pesticidal compositions | SYNGENTA PARTICIPANTS AG (CH) | 2016-10-11 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| US-9462808-B2 | Pesticidal compositions | SYNGENTA PARTICIPANTS AG (CH) | 2016-10-11 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| EP-2575449-B1 | PESTICIDAL COMPOSITIONS | SYNGENTA PARTICIPATIONS AG (CH) | 2016-04-27 | — | — | EP | disclosed |
| US-9018135-B2 | Pesticidal compositions | SYNGENTA PARTICIPATIONS AG (CH) | 2015-04-28 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| US-9018135-B2 | Pesticidal compositions | SYNGENTA PARTICIPATIONS AG (CH) | 2015-04-28 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| US-20140057930-A1 | METHOD OF CONTROLLING NEONICOTINOID RESISTANT HEMIPTERA | SYNGENTA PARTICIPATIONS AG (CH) | 2014-02-27 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| US-20140057930-A1 | METHOD OF CONTROLLING NEONICOTINOID RESISTANT HEMIPTERA | SYNGENTA PARTICIPATIONS AG (CH) | 2014-02-27 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| US-20140018242-A1 | METHOD OF CROP ENHANCEMENT | SYNGENTA PARTICIPATIONS AG (CH) | 2014-01-16 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| EP-2352376-B1 | SPIROHETEROCYCLIC N-OXYAMIDES AS PESTICIDES | SYNGENTA PARTICIPATIONS AG (CH) | 2014-01-01 | — | — | EP | disclosed |
| US-20130225411-A1 | PESTICIDAL COMPOSITIONS | SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION LLC (US) | 2013-08-29 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| US-20130225411-A1 | PESTICIDAL COMPOSITIONS | SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION LLC (US) | 2013-08-29 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| US-20130150394-A1 | PESTICIDAL COMPOSITIONS | SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION LLC (US) | 2013-06-13 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| WO-2011151249-A2 | METHOD OF CONTROLLING NEONICOTINOID RESISTANT HEMIPTERA | SYNGENTA PARTICIPATIONS AG (CH) | 2011-12-08 | — | — | WO | disclosed |
| WO-2011151248-A1 | PESTICIDAL COMPOSITIONS | SYNGENTA PARTICIPATIONS AG (CH) | 2011-12-08 | — | — | WO | disclosed |
| WO-2011151247-A2 | PESTICIDAL COMPOSITIONS | SYNGENTA PARTICIPATIONS AG (CH) | 2011-12-08 | — | — | WO | disclosed |
| US-20110224079-A1 | SPIROHETEROCYCLIC N-OXYAMIDES AS PESTICIDES | SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION LLC (US) | 2011-09-15 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| US-20110224079-A1 | SPIROHETEROCYCLIC N-OXYAMIDES AS PESTICIDES | SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION LLC (US) | 2011-09-15 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| WO-2010063670-A1 | SPIROHETEROCYCLIC N-OXYAMIDES AS PESTICIDES | SYNGENTA PARTICIPATIONS AG (CH) | 2010-06-10 | — | — | WO | disclosed |
Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?
For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (5 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.
| Patent | Title | Text reads most about | Predicted target · text-rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| US-20130150394-A1 | PESTICIDAL COMPOSITIONS | ACHE, DDT, GAP43 | LMNA 3077/4885HSD17B10 2650/4885 |
| US-20130225411-A1 | PESTICIDAL COMPOSITIONS | DDT, CIP2A, CYP51A1 | LMNA 4334/4885HSD17B10 2577/4885 |
| US-20140018242-A1 | METHOD OF CROP ENHANCEMENT | MYB, GUSB, CHAT | LMNA 1892/4885HSD17B10 1661/4885 |
| US-20140057930-A1 | METHOD OF CONTROLLING NEONICOTINOID RESISTANT HEMIPTERA | DDT, NAMPT, NISCH | LMNA 2070/4885HSD17B10 1804/4885 |
| US-20110224079-A1 | SPIROHETEROCYCLIC N-OXYAMIDES AS PESTICIDES | DDT, ODC1, ACHE | LMNA 2902/4885HSD17B10 1081/4885 |
“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.