SCHEMBL4617910

SCHEMBL4617910

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)C(C)(NCCO)C(=O)CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC.COS(=O)(=O)O

nearest known ligand 0.41

Known targets — ChEMBL curated mechanism

ACHECHRM1CHRM3

The experimentally established mechanism targets of None. The predicted profile below is derived independently by chemical similarity — agreement is a validation signal, a miss is honest.

Predicted protein targets (top 18)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ CA12 O43570 1/20 0.41
▸ CA2 P00918 1/20 0.41
▸ CA7 P43166 1/20 0.41
▸ CA9 Q16790 1/20 0.41
▸ CA14 Q9ULX7 1/20 0.41
▸ NAAA Q02083 1/20 0.40
▸ FAAH O00519 8/20 0.39
▸ CES1 P23141 5/20 0.39
▸ CES2 O00748 2/20 0.39
▸ MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.39
▸ CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.39
▸ KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.39
▸ HSD17B10 Q99714 1/20 0.39
▸ EPHX1 P07099 1/20 0.38
▸ CNR2 P34972 2/20 0.38
▸ CNR1 P21554 2/20 0.36
▸ SELP P16109 1/20 0.36
▸ APEX1 P27695 1/20 0.36

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL5712972 1.00 CA12 (0.41) CA12CA2CA7CA9CA14
SCHEMBL4616976 0.93 CNR2 (0.50) FAAHCES1MEN1KMT2ACNR2
SCHEMBL31236334 0.87 CA12 (0.42) CA12CA2CA7CA9CA14
SCHEMBL28388477 0.82 FAAH (0.43) CA12CA2CA7CA9CA14
SCHEMBL28405424 0.81 MAPT (0.39) CA12CA2CA7CA9CA14
SCHEMBL27500926 0.80 CNR2 (0.48) FAAHCES1MEN1CYP1A2KMT2A
SCHEMBL28467259 0.80 FAAH (0.50) FAAHCES1MEN1CYP1A2KMT2A
SCHEMBL26638038 0.78 FAAH (0.39) CA12CA2CA7CA9CA14
SCHEMBL28363752 0.78 FAAH (0.39) CA12CA2CA7CA9CA14
SCHEMBL28718241 0.77 SLC6A5 (0.47) FAAHCES1MEN1KMT2ACNR2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
WO-2008081348-A2 METHOD AND COMPOSITION FOR PERMANENTLY SHAPING HAIR THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (US) 2008-07-10 — — WO claimed
US-20080025937-A1 Method and composition for permanently shaping hair PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, THE 2008-01-31 — — US claimed
EP-1880709-A1 Method and composition for permanently shaping hair Wella Aktiengesellschaft (DE) 2008-01-23 — — EP claimed
WO-2008081348-A2 METHOD AND COMPOSITION FOR PERMANENTLY SHAPING HAIR THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (US) 2008-07-10 — — WO disclosed
US-20080025937-A1 Method and composition for permanently shaping hair PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, THE 2008-01-31 — — US disclosed
EP-1880709-A1 Method and composition for permanently shaping hair Wella Aktiengesellschaft (DE) 2008-01-23 — — EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20080025937-A1 Method and composition for permanently shaping hair DNMT3A, DNMT1, NACA CA12 645/4885CA2 758/4885CA7 476/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback