SCHEMBL4777592

SCHEMBL4777592

CS(=O)(=O)N(CC1CCCNC1)c1ccc(C(=O)NCc2ccc(C(F)(F)F)nc2)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.50

Predicted protein targets (top 14)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
LMNA P02545 2/20 0.44
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.44
GAA P10253 2/20 0.44
KCNH2 Q12809 1/20 0.42
RORC P51449 2/20 0.42
EPHX2 P34913 2/20 0.41
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.41
POLB P06746 1/20 0.41
AGTR1 P30556 1/20 0.41
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 1/20 0.40
NAMPT P43490 1/20 0.39
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.39
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.38
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.38

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL4776523 0.95 LMNA (0.45) LMNASMN1; SMN2GAAKCNH2RORC
SCHEMBL4769756 0.90 LMNA (0.47) LMNASMN1; SMN2GAAKCNH2RORC
SCHEMBL4794402 0.81 LMNA (0.45) LMNASMN1; SMN2GAAKCNH2RORC
SCHEMBL4767917 0.81 LMNA (0.45) LMNASMN1; SMN2GAAKCNH2RORC
SCHEMBL4767910 0.81 LMNA (0.45) LMNASMN1; SMN2GAAKCNH2RORC
SCHEMBL4777591 0.80 NAMPT (0.43) KCNH2RORCNAMPT
SCHEMBL4777340 0.78 GAA (0.52) LMNASMN1; SMN2GAARORCEPHX2
SCHEMBL4770853 0.78 DDR1 (0.43) LMNASMN1; SMN2GAARORCALDH1A1
SCHEMBL4777712 0.76 GAA (0.54) LMNASMN1; SMN2GAAALDH1A1POLB
SCHEMBL4773262 0.76 GAA (0.54) LMNASMN1; SMN2GAAALDH1A1AGTR1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1942888-A2 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS Cytokinetics, Inc. (US) 2008-07-16 EP claimed
US-20070135435-A1 Certain chemical entities, compositions, and methods CYTOKINETICS, INCORPORATED 2007-06-14 US claimed
WO-2007056078-A2 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS CYTOKINETICS, INC. (US) 2007-05-18 WO claimed
EP-1942888-A2 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS Cytokinetics, Inc. (US) 2008-07-16 EP disclosed
US-20070135435-A1 Certain chemical entities, compositions, and methods CYTOKINETICS, INCORPORATED 2007-06-14 US disclosed
WO-2007056078-A2 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS CYTOKINETICS, INC. (US) 2007-05-18 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20070135435-A1 Certain chemical entities, compositions, and methods KIF5B, KIF2C, PLK1 LMNA 1022/4885SMN1; SMN2 1149/4885GAA 466/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.