SCHEMBL4832469

SCHEMBL4832469

CNCc1cc(Cl)cc(C#N)c1

nearest known ligand 0.52

Predicted protein targets (top 10)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
LOXL2 Q9Y4K0 1/20 0.52
NOS3 P29474 5/20 0.40
NOS1 P29475 5/20 0.40
SLC6A4 P31645 3/20 0.40
KCNH2 Q12809 3/20 0.40
SLC6A3 Q01959 1/20 0.40
ADRA1D P25100 1/20 0.39
MASP2 O00187 1/20 0.37
HTR2A P28223 2/20 0.36
GRM5 P41594 1/20 0.35

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL3340427 0.81 CD274 (0.46) LOXL2NOS3NOS1SLC6A4KCNH2
SCHEMBL13226822 0.80 CYP2A6 (0.48) KCNH2ADRA1DGRM5
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL3338248 0.79 KDM4E (0.46) LOXL2NOS3NOS1SLC6A4KCNH2
SCHEMBL5959961 0.78 ADRA1D (0.41) KCNH2ADRA1DGRM5
SCHEMBL19442372 0.77 LOXL2 (0.52) LOXL2NOS3NOS1SLC6A4KCNH2
SCHEMBL19442430 0.77 LOXL2 (0.52) LOXL2NOS3NOS1
SCHEMBL4830164 0.77 LOXL2 (0.52) LOXL2NOS3NOS1GRM5
SCHEMBL18682238 0.77 ADRA1D (0.39) KCNH2ADRA1DGRM5
SCHEMBL25054279 0.76 LOXL2 (0.48) LOXL2ADRA1DGRM5
SCHEMBL2160824 0.76 ADRA1D (0.43) KCNH2ADRA1DGRM5

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-7442692-B2 Indanyl-piperazine compounds LES LABORATOIRES SERVIER (FR) 2008-10-28 US disclosed
WO-2006103342-A9 INDANYL-PIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES, METHOD FOR PREPARING SAME AND PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING SAME SERVIER LAB (FR) 2007-10-25 WO disclosed
EP-1707564-B1 Indanyl-piperazine derivatives, process for their preparation and pharmaceutical compositions containing them SERVIER LAB (FR) 2007-09-12 EP disclosed
US-20060223830-A1 Indanyl-piperazine compounds LES LABORATOIRES SERVIER (FR) 2006-10-05 US disclosed
WO-2006103342-A2 INDANYL-PIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES, METHOD FOR PREPARING SAME AND PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING SAME LES LABORATOIRES SERVIER (FR) 2006-10-05 WO disclosed
EP-1707564-A2 Indanyl-piperazine derivatives, process for their preparation and pharmaceutical compositions containing them Les Laboratoires Servier (FR) 2006-10-04 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20060223830-A1 Indanyl-piperazine compounds HTR4, NR4A1, NR4A3 LOXL2 3963/4885NOS3 845/4885NOS1 1530/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.