SCHEMBL5159689

SCHEMBL5159689

CCOc1cc(C(=O)NC2CCNCC2)ccc1-c1cc2cc(Cl)c(Cl)cc2[nH]1

nearest known ligand 0.45

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
KDR P35968 1/20 0.45
PTK2 Q05397 4/20 0.44
SMYD3 Q9H7B4 1/20 0.43
TOP2A P11388 1/20 0.42
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.41
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.41
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.41
DGAT2 Q96PD7 1/20 0.41
UTS2R Q9UKP6 5/20 0.40
SUV39H2 Q9H5I1 2/20 0.39
HTR4 Q13639 1/20 0.39
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.39
HPGDS O60760 1/20 0.39
HTR1A P08908 1/20 0.39
CYP2D6 P10635 1/20 0.39
DRD2 P14416 1/20 0.39
HTR1D P28221 1/20 0.39
HTR2C P28335 1/20 0.39
HTR1F P30939 1/20 0.39
HTR2B P41595 1/20 0.39

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL5160953 0.89 IGF1R (0.43) DGAT2UTS2R
SCHEMBL14341049 0.86 EZH2 (0.41) KDRHPGDRAB9ASMN1; SMN2DGAT2
SCHEMBL14341052 0.86 HTR4 (0.44) UTS2RHTR4HTR1A
SCHEMBL220979 0.86 KMT2A (0.51)
SCHEMBL6580849 0.85 DRD4 (0.53) SMN1; SMN2
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6787079 0.84 DRD4 (0.52) SMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL6582454 0.84 EZH2 (0.39) HPGDRAB9ASMN1; SMN2DGAT2MAPT
SCHEMBL6580730 0.82 TSHR (0.47) RAB9ASMN1; SMN2MAPT
SCHEMBL14341048 0.82 MAPT (0.35) KDRHPGDRAB9ASMN1; SMN2DGAT2
SCHEMBL14354803 0.80 TAS1R3 (0.52) SMN1; SMN2MAPT

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20070299084-A1 Indole Derivatives Useful for Treating Resistance to Antitumor Agents NIKEM RESE S.R.L. (IT) 2007-12-27 US claimed
EP-1753420-A1 INDOLE DERIVATIVES USEFUL FOR TREATING RESISTANCE TO ANTITUMOUR AGENTS NIKEM RESEARCH S.R.L. (IT) 2007-02-21 EP claimed
WO-2005105078-A1 INDOLE DERIVATIVES USEFUL FOR TREATING RESISTANCE TO ANTITUMOUR AGENTS NIKEM RESEARCH S.R.L. (IT) 2005-11-10 WO claimed
US-20070299084-A1 Indole Derivatives Useful for Treating Resistance to Antitumor Agents NIKEM RESE S.R.L. (IT) 2007-12-27 US disclosed
US-20070299084-A1 Indole Derivatives Useful for Treating Resistance to Antitumor Agents NIKEM RESE S.R.L. (IT) 2007-12-27 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20070299084-A1 Indole Derivatives Useful for Treating Resistance to Antitumor Agents IDO1, IDO2, INMT KDR 3933/4885PTK2 3364/4885SMYD3 2331/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.