SCHEMBL5202432

SCHEMBL5202432

CC(C)(CC(O)(C=O)C(F)(F)F)c1ccc(Cl)c2c1OCO2

nearest known ligand 0.34

Predicted protein targets (top 4)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
NR3C1 P04150 6/20 0.34
NR3C2 P08235 5/20 0.34
PGR P06401 3/20 0.34
AR P10275 1/20 0.31

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL3531222 0.81 NR3C1 (0.38) NR3C1NR3C2PGRAR
SCHEMBL5778087 0.76 HSD11B1 (0.39) NR3C1NR3C2PGR
SCHEMBL331385 0.74 NR3C1 (0.39) NR3C1NR3C2PGR
SCHEMBL4821769 0.73 MRGPRX4 (0.31) NR3C1
SCHEMBL4821773 0.73 MRGPRX4 (0.31) NR3C1
SCHEMBL5775583 0.72 NR3C1 (0.40) NR3C1NR3C2PGR
SCHEMBL4823422 0.71 NR3C1 (0.52) NR3C1NR3C2PGRAR
SCHEMBL3537462 0.71 KMT2A (0.44) PGRAR
SCHEMBL3529504 0.70 NR3C1 (0.46) NR3C1NR3C2PGR
SCHEMBL3529041 0.70 NR3C1 (0.42) NR3C1NR3C2PGR

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 7 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1492771-B1 QUINOLINE AND ISOQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES, METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION THEREOF AND USE THEREOF AS ANTI-INFLAMMATORY AGENTS SCHERING AG (DE) 2007-02-28 EP disclosed
US-7109212-B2 Quinoline and isoquinoline derivatives, a process for their production and their use as inflammation inhibitors SCHERING AG (DE) 2006-09-19 US disclosed
US-20050165050-A1 Quinoline and isoquinoline derivatives, a process for their production and their use as inflammation inhibitors BAYER PHARMA AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (DE) 2005-07-28 US disclosed
US-6897224-B2 Quinoline and isoquinoline derivatives, a process for their production and their use as inflammation inhibitors SCHERING AG (DE) 2005-05-24 US disclosed
EP-1492771-A1 QUINOLINE AND ISOQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES, METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION THEREOF AND USE THEREOF AS ANTI-INFLAMMATORY AGENTS SCHERING AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (DE) 2005-01-05 EP disclosed
US-20040116694-A1 Quinoline and isoquinoline derivatives, a process for their production and their use as inflammation inhibitors SCHERING AG (DE) 2004-06-17 US disclosed
WO-2003082827-A1 QUINOLINE AND ISOQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES, METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION THEREOF AND USE THEREOF AS ANTI-INFLAMMATORY AGENTS SCHERING AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (DE) 2003-10-09 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20050165050-A1 Quinoline and isoquinoline derivatives, a process for their production and their use as inflammation inhibitors NFKBIA, IL1B, IRF3 NR3C1 2380/4885NR3C2 2406/4885PGR 3899/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.