SCHEMBL5337130

SCHEMBL5337130

CN(C)CCNS(=O)(=O)c1ccc(-n2nc(C(N)=O)c3c2-c2cc(NC(=O)c4ccccc4Cl)ccc2CC3)cc1.CS(=O)(=O)O

nearest known ligand 0.61

Known targets — ChEMBL curated mechanism

ABL1ADRA1AADRA1BADRA1DADRA2AADRA2BADRA2CADRB2AGTR1BCL2BCL2A1BCL2L1BCL2L10BCL2L2BCRBRAFCHRM1CHRNA10CHRNA9DRD1DRD2DRD3DRD4DRD5EGFRF2FLT1FLT4GCKGHSRGNRHRGRIN1GRIN2AGRIN2BGRIN2CGRIN2DGRIN3AGRIN3BHTR1AHTR1BHTR1DHTR2AHTR2CHTR3AIDH2KDRKITMAOBMCL1MTTPPP4HBPDGFRBPIK3CAPIK3CBPIK3CDPIK3CGPIK3R1PIK3R2PIK3R3PIK3R5PIKFYVEROCK1ROCK2SLC18A2SLC6A2SLC6A3SLC6A4TACR1TUBA1ATUBA1BTUBA1CTUBA3CTUBA3ETUBA4ATUBBTUBB1TUBB2ATUBB2BTUBB3TUBB4ATUBB4BTUBB6TUBB8gyrAgyrBparCparEpol

The experimentally established mechanism targets of None. The predicted profile below is derived independently by chemical similarity — agreement is a validation signal, a miss is honest.

Predicted protein targets (top 2)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
IKBKB O14920 20/20 0.61
CHUK O15111 1/20 0.51

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL5343081 0.99 IKBKB (0.63) IKBKBCHUK
SCHEMBL14558816 0.99 IKBKB (0.63) IKBKBCHUK
SCHEMBL5335264 0.88 IKBKB (0.58) IKBKBCHUK
SCHEMBL14558548 0.87 IKBKB (0.66) IKBKBCHUK
SCHEMBL5334954 0.87 IKBKB (0.62) IKBKBCHUK
SCHEMBL5350764 0.87 IKBKB (0.64) IKBKBCHUK
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL5340358 0.87 IKBKB (0.65) IKBKBCHUK
SCHEMBL5340908 0.86 IKBKB (0.61) IKBKBCHUK
SCHEMBL5341298 0.86 IKBKB (0.61) IKBKBCHUK
SCHEMBL5336084 0.86 IKBKB (0.62) IKBKBCHUK

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-7186743-B2 Substituted pyrazolyl compounds for the treatment of inflammation PHARMACIA CORPORATION (US) 2007-03-06 US claimed
US-6956052-B2 Substituted pyrazolyl compounds for the treatment of inflammation PHARMACIA CORPORATION (US) 2005-10-18 US claimed
EP-1444207-A2 SUBSTITUTED PYRAZOLYL-COMPOUNDS FOR THE TREATMENT OF INFLAMMATION Pharmacia Corporation (US) 2004-08-11 EP claimed
US-20040110741-A1 Substituted pyrazolyl compounds for the treatment of inflammation PHARMACIA CORPORARTION 2004-06-10 US claimed
WO-2003024935-A2 SUBSTITUTED PYRAZOLYL COMPOUNDS FOR THE TREATMENT OF INFLAMMATION PHARMACIA CORPORATION (US) 2003-03-27 WO claimed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20040110741-A1 Substituted pyrazolyl compounds for the treatment of inflammation IRAK4, IL1B, IRAK2 IKBKB 55/4885CHUK 32/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.