SCHEMBL542729

SCHEMBL542729

Nc1ccn([C@H]2CC[C@@H](COP(=O)(O)OP(=O)(O)OP(=O)(O)OC[C@H]3O[C@@H](n4cnc5c(=O)[nH]c(N)nc54)C[C@@H]3O)O2)c(=O)n1

nearest known ligand 0.67

Predicted protein targets (top 11)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ P2RY2 P41231 5/20 0.67
▸ P2RY4 P51582 4/20 0.67
▸ P2RY6 Q15077 3/20 0.67
▸ POLB P06746 3/20 0.63
▸ FUT5 Q11128 1/20 0.52
▸ TGM2 P21980 1/20 0.49
▸ KRAS P01116 2/20 0.49
▸ DTYMK P23919 4/20 0.47
▸ POLG P54098 1/20 0.47
▸ F2 P00734 1/20 0.47
▸ NT5E P21589 2/20 0.46

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL16701817 0.91 POLB (0.69) P2RY2P2RY4P2RY6POLBFUT5
SCHEMBL24219865 0.90 POLB (0.71) P2RY2P2RY4P2RY6POLBFUT5
SCHEMBL29948896 0.89 POLB (0.70) P2RY2P2RY4P2RY6POLBFUT5
SCHEMBL22053474 0.88 POLB (0.67) P2RY2P2RY4P2RY6POLBFUT5
SCHEMBL22053473 0.88 POLB (0.67) P2RY2P2RY4P2RY6POLBFUT5
Deoxyguanosine SCHEMBL20445785 0.86 POLB (0.67) P2RY2P2RY4P2RY6POLBFUT5
SCHEMBL29365434 0.86 P2RY2 (0.62) P2RY2P2RY4P2RY6POLBFUT5
SCHEMBL29371610 0.86 P2RY2 (0.62) P2RY2P2RY4P2RY6POLBFUT5
SCHEMBL4078522 0.86 P2RY2 (0.62) P2RY2P2RY4P2RY6POLBFUT5
SCHEMBL29702417 0.86 P2RY2 (0.62) P2RY2P2RY4P2RY6POLBFUT5

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20080300215-A1 Prodrugs Activated by Rna-Dependent Dna-Polymerases PROTERA S.R.L. (IT) 2008-12-04 — — US claimed
EP-1778254-A2 PRODRUGS ACTIVATED BY RNA-DEPENDENT DNA-POLYMERASES Protera S.R.L. (IT) 2007-05-02 — — EP claimed
WO-2006013203-A2 PRODRUGS ACTIVATED BY RNA-DEPENDENT DNA-POLYMERASES PROTERA S.R.L. (IT) 2006-02-09 — — WO claimed
US-8110676-B2 Prodrugs activated by RNA-dependent DNA-polymerases PROTERA S.R.L. (IT) 2012-02-07 — — US disclosed
US-20080300215-A1 Prodrugs Activated by Rna-Dependent Dna-Polymerases PROTERA S.R.L. (IT) 2008-12-04 — — US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20080300215-A1 Prodrugs Activated by Rna-Dependent Dna-Polymerases TERT, POLRMT, POLI P2RY2 2889/4885P2RY4 2488/4885P2RY6 2045/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback