SCHEMBL5570059

SCHEMBL5570059

Nc1ccc(O[C@H]2C(O)O[C@H](CO)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]2O)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.49

Predicted protein targets (top 1)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
TYR P14679 3/20 0.49

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL1832156 1.00 TYR (0.49) TYR
SCHEMBL1833558 1.00 TYR (0.49) TYR
SCHEMBL1726312 1.00 TYR (0.49) TYR
SCHEMBL1830946 1.00 TYR (0.49) TYR
SCHEMBL869387 1.00 TYR (0.49) TYR
SCHEMBL291103 1.00 TYR (0.49) TYR
SCHEMBL6253257 1.00 TYR (0.49) TYR
SCHEMBL3146902 1.00 TYR (0.49) TYR
SCHEMBL7152466 1.00 TYR (0.49) TYR
B-D-Galactose SCHEMBL9436427 0.97 TYR (0.50) TYR

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-3601587-A1 METHOD FOR ELECTROCHEMICAL DETECTION OF MYCOBACTERIA Université de Bourgogne (FR) 2020-02-05 EP disclosed
WO-2018178578-A1 METHOD FOR ELECTROCHEMICAL DETECTION OF MYCOBACTERIA Université de Bourgogne (FR) 2018-10-04 WO disclosed
EP-1518823-B1 METAL OXIDE NANOTUBE AND PROCESS FOR PRODUCTION THEREOF JAPAN SCIENCE & TECH AGENCY (JP) 2007-09-26 EP disclosed
US-7172747-B2 Metal oxide nanotube and process for production thereof JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY (JP) 2007-02-06 US disclosed
US-20050077496-A1 Metal oxide nanotube and process for production thereof JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY (JP) 2005-04-14 US disclosed
EP-1518823-A1 METAL OXIDE NANOTUBE AND PROCESS FOR PRODUCTION THEREOF Japan Science and Technology Agency (JP) 2005-03-30 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20050077496-A1 Metal oxide nanotube and process for production thereof HMOX2, HAO2, HMOX1 TYR 2181/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.