SCHEMBL5612844

SCHEMBL5612844

C#Cc1ccc(C2OC=CO2)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.38

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
GABRP O00591 1/20 0.37
GABRD O14764 1/20 0.37
GABRA1 P14867 1/20 0.37
GABRB1 P18505 1/20 0.37
GABRG2 P18507 1/20 0.37
GABRB3 P28472 1/20 0.37
GABRA5 P31644 1/20 0.37
GABRA3 P34903 1/20 0.37
GABRA2 P47869 1/20 0.37
GABRB2 P47870 1/20 0.37
GABRA4 P48169 1/20 0.37
GABRE P78334 1/20 0.37
GABRA6 Q16445 1/20 0.37
GABRG1 Q8N1C3 1/20 0.37
GABRG3 Q99928 1/20 0.37
GABRQ Q9UN88 1/20 0.37
HDAC8 Q9BY41 2/20 0.36
CA12 O43570 1/20 0.34
CA1 P00915 1/20 0.34
CA2 P00918 1/20 0.34

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL861173 0.75 HTR2C (0.45) CA12CA1CA2CA9CA14
SCHEMBL92259 0.72 GABRP (0.38) GABRPGABRDGABRA1GABRB1GABRG2
SCHEMBL28871 0.71 HDAC8 (0.59) GABRPGABRDGABRA1GABRB1GABRG2
SCHEMBL20361569 0.70 SUCNR1 (0.39) GABRPGABRDGABRA1GABRB1GABRG2
SCHEMBL20362107 0.70 SUCNR1 (0.39) GABRPGABRDGABRA1GABRB1GABRG2
SCHEMBL20366280 0.70 SUCNR1 (0.39) GABRPGABRDGABRA1GABRB1GABRG2
SCHEMBL19122264 0.68 TSHR (0.50) GABRPGABRDGABRA1GABRB1GABRG2
Ammonia Solution, Strong SCHEMBL22721248 0.68 HDAC8 (0.56) GABRPGABRDGABRA1GABRB1GABRG2
SCHEMBL10481152 0.68 HDAC8 (0.56) GABRPGABRDGABRA1GABRB1GABRG2
SCHEMBL490963 0.67 CYP2C19 (0.46) SLC6A2SLC6A3

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 12 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20030220371-A1 Compounds and methods SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION 2003-11-27 US claimed
EP-1274424-A4 COMPOUNDS AND METHODS SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORP (US) 2003-09-17 EP claimed
EP-1274424-A1 COMPOUNDS AND METHODS SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION (US) 2003-01-15 EP claimed
WO-2001078723-A1 COMPOUNDS AND METHODS SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION (US) 2001-10-25 WO claimed
US-20070077641-A1 Methionine aminopeptidase and methods of use PALMER LESLIE 2007-04-05 US disclosed
EP-1624849-A2 METHIONINE AMINOPEPTIDASE AND METHODS OF USE SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION (US) 2006-02-15 EP disclosed
WO-2005016237-A2 METHIONINE AMINOPEPTIDASE AND METHODS OF USE SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION (US) 2005-02-24 WO disclosed
US-20050004116-A1 1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl derivatives; antiangiogenesis agents SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION 2005-01-06 US disclosed
US-20030220371-A1 Compounds and methods SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION 2003-11-27 US disclosed
EP-1274424-A4 COMPOUNDS AND METHODS SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORP (US) 2003-09-17 EP disclosed
EP-1274424-A1 COMPOUNDS AND METHODS SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION (US) 2003-01-15 EP disclosed
WO-2001078723-A1 COMPOUNDS AND METHODS SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION (US) 2001-10-25 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20050004116-A1 1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl derivatives; antiangiogenesis agents METAP1, METAP2, DNPEP GABRP 3808/4885GABRD 4859/4885GABRA1 4704/4885
US-20030220371-A1 Compounds and methods METAP2, METAP1, DNPEP GABRP 4226/4885GABRD 4873/4885GABRA1 4804/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.