SCHEMBL5792278

SCHEMBL5792278

[CH2]Cc1c(NC(=O)c2cc3cc(N)ccc3o2)cc(N(C=O)OC(C)(C)C)c2ccccc12

nearest known ligand 0.42

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
RAB9A P51151 10/20 0.42
NPC1 O15118 9/20 0.42
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 2/20 0.36
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.36
TP53 P04637 2/20 0.36
KDM4E B2RXH2 5/20 0.35
ALDH1A1 P00352 4/20 0.35
HPGD P15428 4/20 0.35
HSD17B10 Q99714 4/20 0.35
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 2/20 0.35
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.35
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.35
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.35
CYP2C9 P11712 1/20 0.35
MAPT P10636 2/20 0.35
GAA P10253 1/20 0.35
HCRTR1 O43613 1/20 0.35
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.35
FLT3 P36888 1/20 0.34
TSHR P16473 3/20 0.34

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL7256067 0.91 RAB9A (0.41) RAB9ANPC1L3MBTL1SMN1; SMN2TP53
SCHEMBL6237416 0.80 RAB9A (0.45) RAB9ANPC1L3MBTL1SMN1; SMN2TP53
SCHEMBL5790301 0.80 NPC1 (0.45) RAB9ANPC1KDM4EALDH1A1HPGD
SCHEMBL6263397 0.78 RAB9A (0.44) RAB9ANPC1ALDH1A1HSD17B10LMNA
SCHEMBL5792560 0.78 NPC1 (0.42) RAB9ANPC1HPGDNPSR1LMNA
SCHEMBL5790527 0.77 NPC1 (0.42) RAB9ANPC1NPSR1LMNAMAPT
SCHEMBL7256063 0.71 RAB9A (0.44) RAB9ANPC1L3MBTL1SMN1; SMN2TP53
SCHEMBL2416088 0.65 GAA (0.46) RAB9ANPC1L3MBTL1ALDH1A1LMNA
SCHEMBL5732923 0.64 RAD52 (0.45)
Tert-Butyl Formate SCHEMBL28177432 0.62 TAS1R3 (0.53) RAB9ANPC1L3MBTL1SMN1; SMN2TP53

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1320522-B8 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF THE USE THEREOF ACHIRAL ANALOGUES OF CC-1065 AND THE DUOCARMYCINS LEE MOSES (US) 2006-02-01 EP disclosed
EP-1320522-B1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF THE USE THEREOF ACHIRAL ANALOGUES OF CC-1065 AND THE DUOCARMYCINS TAIHO PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD (JP) 2005-11-23 EP disclosed
EP-1320522-A2 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF THE USE THEREOF ACHIRAL ANALOGUES OF CC-1065 AND THE DUOCARMYCINS TAIHO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. (JP) 2003-06-25 EP disclosed
US-20030073731-A1 Compositions and methods of the use thereof achiral analogues of CC-1065 and the duocarmycins MEDIMMUNE LIMITED (GB) 2003-04-17 US disclosed
WO-2002030894-A2 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF THE USE THEREOF ACHIRAL ANALOGUES OF CC-1065 AND THE DUOCARMYCINS TAIHO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. (JP) 2002-04-18 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030073731-A1 Compositions and methods of the use thereof achiral analogues of CC-1065 and the duocarmycins DDB1, ERCC2, SSU72 RAB9A 3639/4885NPC1 2541/4885L3MBTL1 278/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.