SCHEMBL5951328

SCHEMBL5951328

O=C1c2c(Cl)cccc2CC1Cc1ccccc1

nearest known ligand 0.56

Predicted protein targets (top 4)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
ABCB1 P08183 6/20 0.50
CYP19A1 P11511 2/20 0.48
SIGMAR1 Q99720 1/20 0.41
NOS3 P29474 1/20 0.40

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL5951765 0.80 HTR2A (0.40) NOS3
SCHEMBL5952666 0.79 HTR2A (0.37) ABCB1NOS3
SCHEMBL5952510 0.77 NOS3 (0.38) ABCB1NOS3
SCHEMBL5952581 0.77 GRM2 (0.41) NOS3
SCHEMBL5951664 0.76 CYP19A1 (0.53) ABCB1CYP19A1SIGMAR1
SCHEMBL2388260 0.76 HTR2A (0.37) NOS3
SCHEMBL5953404 0.76 HTR2A (0.37) ABCB1NOS3
SCHEMBL3033688 0.76 CYP19A1 (0.77) CYP19A1SIGMAR1
SCHEMBL5952451 0.75 ACHE (0.39) NOS3
SCHEMBL2390359 0.74 ACHE (0.44)

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-7038070-B2 Preparation of preparing substituted indanones BASELL POLYOLEFINE GMBH (DE) 2006-05-02 US disclosed
US-6963017-B2 Preparation of preparing substituted indanones BASELL POLYOLEFINE GMBH (DE) 2005-11-08 US disclosed
EP-0968158-B1 METHOD OF PREPARING SUBSTITUTED INDANONES, THE SUBSTITUTED INDANONES AND METALLOCENES PREPARED THEREFROM BASELL POLYOLEFINE GMBH (DE) 2005-08-10 EP disclosed
US-20050033076-A1 Preparation of preparing substituted indanones EQUISTAR CHEMICALS, LP 2005-02-10 US disclosed
US-20030009046-A1 Preparation of preparing substituted indanones EQUISTAR CHEMICALS, LP 2003-01-09 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20050033076-A1 Preparation of preparing substituted indanones CYP1A2, CYP2J2, IDH3A ABCB1 1146/4885CYP19A1 18/4885SIGMAR1 3038/4885
US-20030009046-A1 Preparation of preparing substituted indanones CYP1A2, CYP1B1, CYP1A1 ABCB1 1132/4885CYP19A1 17/4885SIGMAR1 2661/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.