Hydrochloric Acid

Hydrochloric Acid

SCHEMBL5951673

CCC1=Cc2c(-c3cc(C(F)(F)F)cc(C(F)(F)F)c3)cccc2C1[Zr+2]C1C(CC)=Cc2c(-c3cc(C(F)(F)F)cc(C(F)(F)F)c3)cccc21.[Cl-].[Cl-]

nearest known ligand 0.38

Full drug profile on Sugi Atlas →

Known targets — ChEMBL curated mechanism

ACHEBDKRB2CHRM1CHRM2CHRM3CHRNA1CHRNB1CHRNDCHRNECHRNGGUCY1A1GUCY1A2GUCY1B1GUCY1B2NAMPTPTAFRSLC10A2SLC6A2SLC6A3TACR1dacAdacBdacCftsImrcAmrcBmrdA

The experimentally established mechanism targets of Hydrochloric Acid. The predicted profile below is derived independently by chemical similarity — agreement is a validation signal, a miss is honest.

Predicted protein targets (top 7)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
TACR1 known ✓ P25103 1/20 0.30
HTR1A P08908 2/20 0.38
HTR7 P34969 2/20 0.38
PARP1 P09874 1/20 0.32
AKR1C3 P42330 1/20 0.31
AKR1C2 P52895 1/20 0.31
PTPN5 P54829 1/20 0.30

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL29612277 0.89 DRD2 (0.36) PARP1
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL27479364 0.80 PDCD1 (0.32)
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL2524023 0.80 BRD4 (0.32) PARP1
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL29612303 0.80 BRD4 (0.32) PARP1
SCHEMBL5951680 0.80 HTR1A (0.35) HTR1AHTR7AKR1C3AKR1C2TACR1
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL8460988 0.79 HTR1A (0.35) HTR1AHTR7
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL8465338 0.79 HTR1A (0.33) HTR1AHTR7
SCHEMBL8169998 0.79 HTR1A (0.34) HTR1AHTR7AKR1C3AKR1C2
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL29612338 0.78 SYK (0.33)
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL29612340 0.78 EDNRB (0.35)

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-7038070-B2 Preparation of preparing substituted indanones BASELL POLYOLEFINE GMBH (DE) 2006-05-02 US disclosed
US-6963017-B2 Preparation of preparing substituted indanones BASELL POLYOLEFINE GMBH (DE) 2005-11-08 US disclosed
EP-0968158-B1 METHOD OF PREPARING SUBSTITUTED INDANONES, THE SUBSTITUTED INDANONES AND METALLOCENES PREPARED THEREFROM BASELL POLYOLEFINE GMBH (DE) 2005-08-10 EP disclosed
US-20050033076-A1 Preparation of preparing substituted indanones EQUISTAR CHEMICALS, LP 2005-02-10 US disclosed
US-20030009046-A1 Preparation of preparing substituted indanones EQUISTAR CHEMICALS, LP 2003-01-09 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20050033076-A1 Preparation of preparing substituted indanones CYP1A2, CYP2J2, IDH3A TACR1 2664/4885HTR1A 2570/4885HTR7 1861/4885
US-20030009046-A1 Preparation of preparing substituted indanones CYP1A2, CYP1B1, CYP1A1 TACR1 2706/4885HTR1A 2132/4885HTR7 2049/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.