SCHEMBL5953323

SCHEMBL5953323

CC1=Cc2c(ccc(C)c2-c2cccc3ccccc23)C1[Zr](Cl)(Cl)(C1C(C)=Cc2c1ccc(C)c2-c1cccc2ccccc12)[SiH](C)C

nearest known ligand 0.36

Predicted protein targets (top 7)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
DHFR P00374 1/20 0.36
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.31
CYP2A6 P11509 1/20 0.31
GSK3B P49841 1/20 0.30
ADK P55263 1/20 0.30
TYMP P19971 1/20 0.30
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.30

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL144200 0.88 HSD11B1 (0.32) CYP2A6
SCHEMBL5609106 0.88
SCHEMBL137885 0.86 ENPP3 (0.32) DHFRALDH1A1CYP2A6
SCHEMBL5608788 0.84
SCHEMBL5614511 0.84
SCHEMBL5953276 0.83 CA12 (0.32) DHFRALDH1A1CYP2A6
SCHEMBL5609257 0.82
SCHEMBL5610241 0.82
SCHEMBL4625507 0.81
SCHEMBL137555 0.81 HTR1A (0.33)

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-7038070-B2 Preparation of preparing substituted indanones BASELL POLYOLEFINE GMBH (DE) 2006-05-02 US disclosed
US-6963017-B2 Preparation of preparing substituted indanones BASELL POLYOLEFINE GMBH (DE) 2005-11-08 US disclosed
EP-0968158-B1 METHOD OF PREPARING SUBSTITUTED INDANONES, THE SUBSTITUTED INDANONES AND METALLOCENES PREPARED THEREFROM BASELL POLYOLEFINE GMBH (DE) 2005-08-10 EP disclosed
US-20050033076-A1 Preparation of preparing substituted indanones EQUISTAR CHEMICALS, LP 2005-02-10 US disclosed
US-20030009046-A1 Preparation of preparing substituted indanones EQUISTAR CHEMICALS, LP 2003-01-09 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20050033076-A1 Preparation of preparing substituted indanones CYP1A2, CYP2J2, IDH3A DHFR 578/4885ALDH1A1 317/4885CYP2A6 64/4885
US-20030009046-A1 Preparation of preparing substituted indanones CYP1A2, CYP1B1, CYP1A1 DHFR 594/4885ALDH1A1 198/4885CYP2A6 78/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.