SCHEMBL5953729

SCHEMBL5953729

CNCC1=Cc2ccccc2Oc2ccccc21

nearest known ligand 0.44

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
DRD2 P14416 7/20 0.44
DRD4 P21917 7/20 0.44
GPR84 Q9NQS5 1/20 0.40
LMNA P02545 2/20 0.35
MTNR1A P48039 1/20 0.35
MTNR1B P49286 1/20 0.35
MAPT P10636 4/20 0.35
CYP3A4 P08684 3/20 0.35
CYP1A2 P05177 3/20 0.35
CYP2D6 P10635 3/20 0.35
TP53 P04637 2/20 0.35
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.35
TDP1 Q9NUW8 1/20 0.35
KDM4E B2RXH2 3/20 0.33
MAPK1 P28482 2/20 0.33
TRPA1 O75762 1/20 0.33
ATM Q13315 1/20 0.33
CA12 O43570 1/20 0.33
CA9 Q16790 1/20 0.33
SETD7 Q8WTS6 1/20 0.32

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL8892605 0.83 DRD2 (0.40) DRD2DRD4GPR84LMNAMTNR1A
SCHEMBL5952981 0.82 TRPA1 (0.39) DRD2DRD4LMNAMTNR1AMAPT
SCHEMBL5953124 0.81 DRD2 (0.40) DRD2DRD4GPR84LMNAMTNR1A
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL9056904 0.80 DRD2 (0.40) DRD2DRD4GPR84LMNAMTNR1A
SCHEMBL4617636 0.80 DRD2 (0.40) DRD2DRD4GPR84LMNAMTNR1A
SCHEMBL5953495 0.80 TP53 (0.40) DRD2DRD4GPR84LMNAMAPT
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL7769530 0.79 DRD2 (0.39) DRD2DRD4GPR84LMNAMTNR1A
SCHEMBL5953253 0.79 KMT2A (0.40) DRD2DRD4GPR84MAPTKDM4E
SCHEMBL7769523 0.77 DRD2 (0.44) DRD2DRD4GPR84LMNAMAPT
SCHEMBL6685325 0.77 DRD2 (0.44) DRD2DRD4GPR84LMNAMAPT

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20060100269-A1 Use of 10-aminoaliphatyl-dibenz[b,f]oxepines for the treatment of degenerative ocular disorders LAMBROU GEORGE N 2006-05-11 US claimed
EP-0726265-A1 10-Aminoaliphatyl-dibenz(b,f)oxepins with antineurodegenarative activity CIBA-GEIGY AG (CH) 1996-08-14 EP claimed
US-20060100269-A1 Use of 10-aminoaliphatyl-dibenz[b,f]oxepines for the treatment of degenerative ocular disorders LAMBROU GEORGE N 2006-05-11 US disclosed
EP-1589963-A1 USE OF 10-AMINOALIPHATYL-DIBENZ B,F OXEPINES FOR THE TR EATMENT OF DEGENERATIVE OCULAR DISORDERS Novartis AG (CH) 2005-11-02 EP disclosed
WO-2004066993-A1 USE OF 10-AMINOALIPHATYL-DIBENZ[B,F]OXEPINES FOR THE TREATMENT OF DEGENERATIVE OCULAR DISORDERS NOVARTIS AG (CH) 2004-08-12 WO disclosed
EP-0726265-A1 10-Aminoaliphatyl-dibenz(b,f)oxepins with antineurodegenarative activity CIBA-GEIGY AG (CH) 1996-08-14 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20060100269-A1 Use of 10-aminoaliphatyl-dibenz[b,f]oxepines for the treatment of degenerative ocular disorders DBH, MAOB, AADAT DRD2 28/4885DRD4 79/4885GPR84 209/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.