Betaine

Betaine

SCHEMBL6063778

C=C(C)C(=O)OCC[N+](C)(C)CC(O)CS(=O)(=O)O.C[N+](C)(C)CC(=O)O

nearest known ligand 0.35

Full drug profile on Sugi Atlas →

Known targets — ChEMBL curated mechanism

BHMTBHMT2

The experimentally established mechanism targets of Betaine. The predicted profile below is derived independently by chemical similarity — agreement is a validation signal, a miss is honest.

Predicted protein targets (top 9)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.35
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.35
APEX1 P27695 1/20 0.35
TSHR P16473 4/20 0.33
THRB P10828 1/20 0.32
CHRM5 P08912 1/20 0.31
CHRM1 P11229 1/20 0.31
CHRM3 P20309 1/20 0.31
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.31

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6979463 0.92 THRB (0.37) TSHRTHRBCHRM5CHRM1CHRM3
SCHEMBL23542781 0.84 TSHR (0.41) APEX1TSHRTHRB
Betaine SCHEMBL5168150 0.82 APEX1 (0.40) ALDH1A1LMNAAPEX1TSHRTHRB
SCHEMBL14806743 0.81 CHRM5 (0.35) CHRM5CHRM1CHRM3MAPT
SCHEMBL23542774 0.80 THRB (0.36) TSHRTHRBCHRM5CHRM1CHRM3
Betaine SCHEMBL513480 0.80 APEX1 (0.38) ALDH1A1LMNAAPEX1TSHRTHRB
Betaine SCHEMBL6062726 0.79 APEX1 (0.48) ALDH1A1LMNAAPEX1TSHRTHRB
SCHEMBL29292245 0.79 THRB (0.42) ALDH1A1LMNAAPEX1TSHRTHRB
Betaine SCHEMBL14857276 0.79 APEX1 (0.37) ALDH1A1LMNAAPEX1TSHRTHRB
Betaine SCHEMBL5170046 0.79 APEX1 (0.37) ALDH1A1LMNAAPEX1TSHRTHRB

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-7012048-B2 Composition and method for treating hair containing a cationic ampholytic polymer and an anionic benefit agent NATIONAL STARCH AND CHEMICAL INVESTMENT HOLDING CORPORATION (US) 2006-03-14 US disclosed
US-20040224862-A1 Composition and method for treating hair containing a cationic ampholytic polymer and an anionic benefit agent AKZO NOBEL N.V. (NL) 2004-11-11 US disclosed
EP-1447075-A2 Composition and method for treating hair containing a cationic ampholytic polymer and an anionic benefit agent National Starch and Chemical Investment Holding Corporation (US) 2004-08-18 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20040224862-A1 Composition and method for treating hair containing a cationic ampholytic polymer and an anionic benefit agent KRT18, PSAP, AREG ALDH1A1 2683/4885LMNA 1351/4885APEX1 2597/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.