SCHEMBL625151

SCHEMBL625151

Oc1ccccc1N=Nc1ccccc1O.[Co]

nearest known ligand 0.94

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
MAPT P10636 7/20 0.94
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 5/20 0.94
LMNA P02545 5/20 0.94
MEN1 O00255 5/20 0.94
KMT2A Q03164 5/20 0.94
NPC1 O15118 4/20 0.94
HTT P42858 4/20 0.94
KDM4E B2RXH2 3/20 0.94
RAB9A P51151 5/20 0.50
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 5/20 0.50
ALDH1A1 P00352 4/20 0.50
TDP1 Q9NUW8 3/20 0.50
POLB P06746 3/20 0.50
CA12 O43570 2/20 0.50
CA2 P00918 2/20 0.50
HSD17B10 Q99714 2/20 0.50
ALOX15 P16050 2/20 0.50
GMNN O75496 1/20 0.50
EGFR P00533 1/20 0.50
FYN P06241 1/20 0.50

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL29354111 0.97 MAPT (1.00) MAPTSMN1; SMN2LMNAMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL574042 0.97 MAPT (1.00) MAPTSMN1; SMN2LMNAMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL131175 0.97 MAPT (1.00) MAPTSMN1; SMN2LMNAMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL27424715 0.94 MAPT (0.94) MAPTSMN1; SMN2LMNAMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL29710671 0.94 MAPT (0.94) MAPTSMN1; SMN2LMNAMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL27424712 0.94 MAPT (0.94) MAPTSMN1; SMN2LMNAMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL6707273 0.94 MAPT (0.94) MAPTSMN1; SMN2LMNAMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL28553431 0.87 MEN1 (0.80) MAPTSMN1; SMN2LMNAMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL4670227 0.85 MAPT (0.76) MAPTSMN1; SMN2LMNAMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL16341089 0.85 MAPT (0.76) MAPTSMN1; SMN2LMNAMEN1KMT2A

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-9199924-B2 Process for the preparation of urethanes BAYER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GMBH (DE) 2015-12-01 US disclosed
EP-2603319-B1 PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF URETHANS BAYER IP GMBH (DE) 2014-10-22 EP disclosed
US-20130303740-A1 METHOD FOR PRODUCING URETHANES BAYER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GMBH (DE) 2013-11-14 US disclosed
EP-2603319-A1 METHOD FOR PRODUCING URETHANES Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH (DE) 2013-06-19 EP disclosed
WO-2012020028-A1 METHOD FOR PRODUCING URETHANES BAYER MATERIALSCIENCE AG (DE) 2012-02-16 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20130303740-A1 METHOD FOR PRODUCING URETHANES SOD1, AOC2, DUOX2 MAPT 598/4885SMN1; SMN2 2152/4885LMNA 1462/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.