SCHEMBL6434229

SCHEMBL6434229

CN(CC(=O)OC(C)(C)C)S(=O)(=O)c1ccc2c(Cl)cnc(Cl)c2c1

nearest known ligand 0.54

Predicted protein targets (top 6)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PLAU P00749 11/20 0.54
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.40
PLG P00747 3/20 0.39
PLAT P00750 2/20 0.39
ALOX15 P16050 1/20 0.39
KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.37

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6433083 0.85 PLAU (0.57) PLAUALDH1A1PLGPLATKMT2A
SCHEMBL6434219 0.85 PLAU (0.52) PLAUALDH1A1PLGPLATKMT2A
SCHEMBL6433131 0.83 PLAU (0.58) PLAUALDH1A1PLG
SCHEMBL6436535 0.83 PLAU (0.49) PLAUALDH1A1PLGPLAT
SCHEMBL7403796 0.82 PLAU (0.52) PLAUALDH1A1PLGPLATALOX15
SCHEMBL6436527 0.82 PLAU (0.46) PLAUPLGPLAT
SCHEMBL6435157 0.82 PLAU (0.46) PLAUPLGPLAT
SCHEMBL6434861 0.82 PLAU (0.59) PLAUPLGPLAT
SCHEMBL6434727 0.81 PLAU (0.45) PLAUALDH1A1PLGPLAT
SCHEMBL6432952 0.81 PLAU (0.47) PLAUALDH1A1PLGALOX15KMT2A

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue DACK KEVIN NEIL (GB) 2005-02-03 US disclosed
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue PFIZER INC. 2003-10-23 US disclosed
EP-1077945-B1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER (US) 2003-01-08 EP disclosed
EP-1242120-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I:UPA OR I:MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE Pfizer Limited (GB) 2002-09-25 EP disclosed
WO-2001049309-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I: UPA OR I: MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE PFIZER LIMITED (GB) 2001-07-12 WO disclosed
EP-1077945-A1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER INC. (US) 2001-02-28 EP disclosed
US-6093731-A Isoquinolines PFIZER INC. 2000-07-25 US disclosed
WO-2000005214-A2 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER INC. (US) 2000-02-03 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 PLAU 119/4885ALDH1A1 2641/4885PLG 33/4885
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 PLAU 119/4885ALDH1A1 2641/4885PLG 33/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.