SCHEMBL6433846

SCHEMBL6433846

CC(C)(C)OC(=O)CCNC(=O)c1ccc2c(Cl)cnc(NC(=N)N)c2c1

nearest known ligand 0.47

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
DGAT2 Q96PD7 1/20 0.47
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.37
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.37
LRRK2 Q5S007 1/20 0.37
CSNK2A2 P19784 1/20 0.37
CLK2 P49760 1/20 0.37
CSNK2B P67870 1/20 0.37
CSNK2A1 P68400 1/20 0.37
CSNK2A3 Q8NEV1 1/20 0.37
CA1 P00915 1/20 0.36
CA2 P00918 1/20 0.36
STK17B O94768 1/20 0.36
STK17A Q9UEE5 1/20 0.36
PI4KA P42356 1/20 0.36
PI4KB Q9UBF8 1/20 0.36
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.35
PTPRC P08575 2/20 0.35
NAMPT P43490 2/20 0.34
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.34
STAT3 P40763 1/20 0.34

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6437624 0.91 PTPRC (0.43) DGAT2MAPTLRRK2CA1CA2
SCHEMBL6436909 0.85 DGAT2 (0.50) DGAT2MAPTSMN1; SMN2CSNK2A2CLK2
SCHEMBL6436503 0.85 CA1 (0.48) SMN1; SMN2CSNK2A2CSNK2BCSNK2A1CSNK2A3
SCHEMBL6436986 0.82 ROCK2 (0.34) DGAT2MAPTLRRK2CA1CA2
SCHEMBL6433070 0.81 PLAU (0.52) MAPTSMN1; SMN2PLAU
SCHEMBL6433233 0.80 ROCK2 (0.41)
SCHEMBL6432919 0.79 CA1 (0.39) DGAT2MAPTSMN1; SMN2LRRK2CA1
SCHEMBL7367423 0.79 POLB (0.46) MAPT
SCHEMBL6432702 0.78 GRN (0.41) MAPTLRRK2CA1CA2STAT3
SCHEMBL6434410 0.78 MAPT (0.45) MAPTCA1CA2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue DACK KEVIN NEIL (GB) 2005-02-03 US disclosed
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue PFIZER INC. 2003-10-23 US disclosed
EP-1077945-B1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER (US) 2003-01-08 EP disclosed
EP-1242120-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I:UPA OR I:MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE Pfizer Limited (GB) 2002-09-25 EP disclosed
WO-2001049309-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I: UPA OR I: MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE PFIZER LIMITED (GB) 2001-07-12 WO disclosed
EP-1077945-A1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER INC. (US) 2001-02-28 EP disclosed
US-6093731-A Isoquinolines PFIZER INC. 2000-07-25 US disclosed
WO-2000005214-A2 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER INC. (US) 2000-02-03 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 DGAT2 2226/4885MAPT 2392/4885SMN1; SMN2 2612/4885
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 DGAT2 2226/4885MAPT 2392/4885SMN1; SMN2 2612/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.