SCHEMBL6434196

SCHEMBL6434196

CC(C)(C)OC(=O)CN(CC1CCCCC1)S(=O)(=O)c1ccc2c(Cl)cnc(Cl)c2c1

nearest known ligand 0.58

Predicted protein targets (top 12)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PLAU P00749 7/20 0.58
PLG P00747 2/20 0.58
CNR2 P34972 1/20 0.39
TRPM8 Q7Z2W7 1/20 0.39
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.37
PTGES O14684 1/20 0.37
TAS2R14 Q9NYV8 1/20 0.37
S1PR1 P21453 2/20 0.37
MMP3 P08254 2/20 0.35
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.35
PLAT P00750 1/20 0.35
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.35

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6434861 0.99 PLAU (0.59) PLAUPLGCNR2TRPM8MAPK1
SCHEMBL6434326 0.87 PLAU (0.56) PLAUPLGCNR2TRPM8MAPK1
SCHEMBL6434318 0.86 PLAU (0.57) PLAUPLGCNR2TRPM8MAPK1
SCHEMBL7496370 0.85 PLAU (0.55) PLAUPLGTRPM8MAPK1PTGES
SCHEMBL7407321 0.85 PLAU (0.76) PLAUPLGTRPM8MAPK1PTGES
SCHEMBL6434229 0.81 PLAU (0.54) PLAUPLGPLAT
SCHEMBL6433131 0.81 PLAU (0.58) PLAUPLGTRPM8TAS2R14
SCHEMBL6436535 0.80 PLAU (0.49) PLAUPLGTRPM8PLAT
SCHEMBL6434727 0.79 PLAU (0.45) PLAUPLGTRPM8MAPK1TAS2R14
SCHEMBL6433766 0.79 PLAU (0.51) PLAUPLGTAS2R14LMNA

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue DACK KEVIN NEIL (GB) 2005-02-03 US disclosed
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue PFIZER INC. 2003-10-23 US disclosed
EP-1077945-B1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER (US) 2003-01-08 EP disclosed
EP-1242120-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I:UPA OR I:MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE Pfizer Limited (GB) 2002-09-25 EP disclosed
WO-2001049309-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I: UPA OR I: MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE PFIZER LIMITED (GB) 2001-07-12 WO disclosed
EP-1077945-A1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER INC. (US) 2001-02-28 EP disclosed
US-6093731-A Isoquinolines PFIZER INC. 2000-07-25 US disclosed
WO-2000005214-A2 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER INC. (US) 2000-02-03 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 PLAU 119/4885PLG 33/4885CNR2 3546/4885
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 PLAU 119/4885PLG 33/4885CNR2 3546/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.