SCHEMBL6435378

SCHEMBL6435378

CC(C)(C)OC(=O)[C@H]1CCCN1S(=O)(=O)c1ccc2c(Cl)cnc(NC(=N)N)c2c1

nearest known ligand 0.55

Predicted protein targets (top 7)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PLAU P00749 7/20 0.55
CASP3 P42574 1/20 0.49
RECQL P46063 1/20 0.43
HCRTR1 O43613 6/20 0.41
HCRTR2 O43614 6/20 0.41
LMNA P02545 2/20 0.41
TSHR P16473 2/20 0.41

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6434561 1.00 PLAU (0.55) PLAUCASP3RECQLHCRTR1HCRTR2
SCHEMBL6977697 0.97 PLAU (0.55) PLAUCASP3RECQLHCRTR1HCRTR2
SCHEMBL6437192 0.91 CASP3 (0.49) PLAUCASP3RECQLHCRTR1HCRTR2
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6437190 0.90 CASP3 (0.48) PLAUCASP3RECQLHCRTR1HCRTR2
SCHEMBL6437421 0.88 PLAU (0.70) PLAURECQLHCRTR1HCRTR2LMNA
SCHEMBL6434295 0.87 PLAU (0.70) PLAURECQLHCRTR1HCRTR2LMNA
SCHEMBL6438651 0.86 CASP3 (0.51) PLAUCASP3RECQLHCRTR1HCRTR2
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6433821 0.86 PLAU (0.69) PLAURECQLHCRTR1HCRTR2LMNA
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6434259 0.86 PLAU (0.69) PLAURECQLHCRTR1HCRTR2LMNA
SCHEMBL6433727 0.86 PLAU (0.57) PLAUCASP3RECQLHCRTR1HCRTR2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue DACK KEVIN NEIL (GB) 2005-02-03 US disclosed
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue PFIZER INC. 2003-10-23 US disclosed
EP-1077945-B1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER (US) 2003-01-08 EP disclosed
EP-1242120-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I:UPA OR I:MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE Pfizer Limited (GB) 2002-09-25 EP disclosed
WO-2001049309-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I: UPA OR I: MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE PFIZER LIMITED (GB) 2001-07-12 WO disclosed
EP-1077945-A1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER INC. (US) 2001-02-28 EP disclosed
US-6093731-A Isoquinolines PFIZER INC. 2000-07-25 US disclosed
WO-2000005214-A2 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER INC. (US) 2000-02-03 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 PLAU 119/4885CASP3 866/4885RECQL 2587/4885
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 PLAU 119/4885CASP3 866/4885RECQL 2587/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.