SCHEMBL6440591

SCHEMBL6440591

COc1cccc(-c2ccc3c(Br)cnc(NC(=N)N)c3c2)c1

nearest known ligand 0.50

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PLAU P00749 1/20 0.50
USP2 O75604 4/20 0.44
CYP1A2 P05177 4/20 0.44
CYP3A4 P08684 4/20 0.44
CYP2C19 P33261 4/20 0.44
CLK4 Q9HAZ1 4/20 0.44
LMNA P02545 3/20 0.44
HSD17B10 Q99714 3/20 0.44
ALDH1A1 P00352 3/20 0.44
CYP2D6 P10635 3/20 0.44
CYP2C9 P11712 2/20 0.44
HDAC6 Q9UBN7 1/20 0.43
MAP4K4 O95819 1/20 0.43
HDAC1 Q13547 5/20 0.42
HDAC2 Q92769 5/20 0.42
HDAC8 Q9BY41 5/20 0.42
KIT P10721 2/20 0.41
BRAF P15056 2/20 0.41
TSHR P16473 2/20 0.41
MAPK1 P28482 2/20 0.41

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6436982 0.90 PLAU (0.47) PLAUCLK4HDAC6MAP4K4HDAC1
SCHEMBL6433004 0.88 PLAU (0.65) PLAUUSP2CYP1A2CYP3A4CYP2C19
SCHEMBL6440595 0.78 PLAU (0.75) PLAUMAP4K4FYNCHEK2
SCHEMBL6437497 0.77 PLAU (0.63) PLAUHDAC6MAP4K4
SCHEMBL6999071 0.76 PLAU (0.52) PLAUUSP2CYP1A2CYP3A4CYP2C19
SCHEMBL16172116 0.72 PLAU (0.48) PLAUCLK4MAP4K4KIT
SCHEMBL6993459 0.72 PLAU (0.50) PLAULMNA
SCHEMBL7000174 0.69 DYRK1A (0.47) PLAUHDAC6MAP4K4HDAC2HDAC8
SCHEMBL6434198 0.69 PLAU (0.66) PLAUUSP2CYP1A2CYP3A4CYP2C19
SCHEMBL7083904 0.67 PLAU (0.65) PLAUUSP2CYP1A2CYP3A4CYP2C19

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 10 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1023268-B1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER LTD (GB) 2003-05-21 EP claimed
US-6248738-B1 ANTIULCER AGENTS, ANGIOGENESIS INHIBITORS, ANTIMETASTASIS AGENTS, ANTITUMOR AGENTS PFIZER INC. 2001-06-19 US claimed
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue DACK KEVIN NEIL (GB) 2005-02-03 US disclosed
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue PFIZER INC. 2003-10-23 US disclosed
EP-1023268-B1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER LTD (GB) 2003-05-21 EP disclosed
EP-1242120-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I:UPA OR I:MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE Pfizer Limited (GB) 2002-09-25 EP disclosed
WO-2001049309-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I: UPA OR I: MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE PFIZER LIMITED (GB) 2001-07-12 WO disclosed
US-6248738-B1 ANTIULCER AGENTS, ANGIOGENESIS INHIBITORS, ANTIMETASTASIS AGENTS, ANTITUMOR AGENTS PFIZER INC. 2001-06-19 US disclosed
EP-1023268-A1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS Pfizer Limited (GB) 2000-08-02 EP disclosed
WO-1999020608-A1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER LIMITED (GB) 1999-04-29 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 PLAU 119/4885USP2 612/4885CYP1A2 3903/4885
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 PLAU 119/4885USP2 612/4885CYP1A2 3903/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.