SCHEMBL6440595

SCHEMBL6440595

COc1cccc(-c2ccc3c(Br)cnc(N=C(N)N)c3c2)c1

nearest known ligand 0.75

Predicted protein targets (top 15)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PLAU P00749 13/20 0.75
PLG P00747 6/20 0.59
PLAT P00750 2/20 0.49
ATP4A P20648 1/20 0.46
ATP4B P51164 1/20 0.46
MAP4K4 O95819 1/20 0.45
HTR3E A5X5Y0 1/20 0.45
HTR3B O95264 1/20 0.45
HTR3A P46098 1/20 0.45
HTR3D Q70Z44 1/20 0.45
HTR3C Q8WXA8 1/20 0.45
TAAR1 Q96RJ0 1/20 0.44
FYN P06241 1/20 0.43
CHEK2 O96017 1/20 0.42
LIMK1 P53667 1/20 0.42

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6436984 0.89 PLAU (0.73) PLAUPLGPLATMAP4K4HTR3E
SCHEMBL6433009 0.86 PLAU (1.00) PLAUPLGPLATATP4AATP4B
SCHEMBL27549722 0.80 PLAU (0.76) PLAUPLGPLATATP4AATP4B
SCHEMBL6999071 0.79 PLAU (0.52) PLAUMAP4K4FYNLIMK1
SCHEMBL6440591 0.78 PLAU (0.50) PLAUMAP4K4FYNCHEK2
SCHEMBL6993461 0.69 PLAU (0.77) PLAUPLGPLAT
SCHEMBL2406367 0.69 DYRK1A (0.54) MAP4K4FYNCHEK2
SCHEMBL7000177 0.68 PLAU (0.80) PLAUPLGPLATATP4AATP4B
SCHEMBL6436982 0.67 PLAU (0.47) PLAUPLGMAP4K4
SCHEMBL1615035 0.67 CYP1A2 (0.53) PLAUMAP4K4

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 12 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1023268-B1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER LTD (GB) 2003-05-21 EP claimed
US-6248738-B1 ANTIULCER AGENTS, ANGIOGENESIS INHIBITORS, ANTIMETASTASIS AGENTS, ANTITUMOR AGENTS PFIZER INC. 2001-06-19 US claimed
EP-1023268-A1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS Pfizer Limited (GB) 2000-08-02 EP claimed
WO-1999020608-A1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER LIMITED (GB) 1999-04-29 WO claimed
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue DACK KEVIN NEIL (GB) 2005-02-03 US disclosed
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue PFIZER INC. 2003-10-23 US disclosed
EP-1023268-B1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER LTD (GB) 2003-05-21 EP disclosed
EP-1242120-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I:UPA OR I:MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE Pfizer Limited (GB) 2002-09-25 EP disclosed
WO-2001049309-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I: UPA OR I: MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE PFIZER LIMITED (GB) 2001-07-12 WO disclosed
US-6248738-B1 ANTIULCER AGENTS, ANGIOGENESIS INHIBITORS, ANTIMETASTASIS AGENTS, ANTITUMOR AGENTS PFIZER INC. 2001-06-19 US disclosed
EP-1023268-A1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS Pfizer Limited (GB) 2000-08-02 EP disclosed
WO-1999020608-A1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER LIMITED (GB) 1999-04-29 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 PLAU 119/4885PLG 33/4885PLAT 48/4885
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 PLAU 119/4885PLG 33/4885PLAT 48/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.