SCHEMBL6456853

SCHEMBL6456853

CN(C)c1cc(N[C@H]2CC[C@@H](NC(=O)c3cc(-c4ccccc4)nc4ccccc34)CC2)nc2ccccc12

nearest known ligand 0.62

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
KLK7 P49862 1/20 0.62
KMT2A Q03164 4/20 0.59
RAB9A P51151 3/20 0.59
MEN1 O00255 2/20 0.59
KDM4E B2RXH2 4/20 0.56
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 2/20 0.56
GLA P06280 2/20 0.53
RECQL P46063 2/20 0.53
TDP1 Q9NUW8 2/20 0.53
PKM P14618 1/20 0.53
APEX1 P27695 1/20 0.53
BLM P54132 1/20 0.53
MCL1 Q07820 1/20 0.53
USP30 Q70CQ3 2/20 0.53
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.52
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.50
POLB P06746 1/20 0.50
GAA P10253 1/20 0.50
CTDSP1 Q9GZU7 1/20 0.50
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.50

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6456858 1.00 KLK7 (0.62) KLK7KMT2ARAB9AMEN1KDM4E
SCHEMBL6868947 0.95 KLK7 (0.57) KLK7KMT2ARAB9AMEN1KDM4E
SCHEMBL6875964 0.89 GAA (0.52) KLK7KMT2ARAB9AMEN1SMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL6875969 0.89 GAA (0.52) KLK7KMT2ARAB9AMEN1SMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL6879647 0.85 MCHR1 (0.49) RAB9AKDM4ESMN1; SMN2GLARECQL
SCHEMBL6879650 0.85 MCHR1 (0.49) RAB9AKDM4ESMN1; SMN2GLARECQL
SCHEMBL6877538 0.85 MCHR1 (0.53) RAB9A
SCHEMBL6877534 0.85 MCHR1 (0.53) RAB9A
SCHEMBL6879865 0.85 MCHR1 (0.57) RAB9AKDM4ESMN1; SMN2LMNA
SCHEMBL6879862 0.85 MCHR1 (0.57) RAB9AKDM4ESMN1; SMN2LMNA

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20050197350-A1 Novel quinoline, tetrahydroquinazoline, and pyrimidine derivatives and methods of treatment related to the use thereof TAISHO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. 2005-09-08 US claimed
WO-2004087669-A1 NOVEL QUINOLINE, TETRAHYDROQUINAZOLINE, AND PYRIMIDINE DERIVATIVES AND METHODS OF TREATMENT RELATED TO THE USE THEREOF TAISHO PHARMACEUTICAL CO. LTD. (JP) 2004-10-14 WO claimed
EP-1464335-A2 Quinoline, tetrahydroquinoline and pyrimidine derivatives as mch antagonist Taisho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. (JP) 2004-10-06 EP claimed
US-20050197350-A1 Novel quinoline, tetrahydroquinazoline, and pyrimidine derivatives and methods of treatment related to the use thereof TAISHO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. 2005-09-08 US disclosed
EP-1464335-A2 Quinoline, tetrahydroquinoline and pyrimidine derivatives as mch antagonist Taisho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. (JP) 2004-10-06 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20050197350-A1 Novel quinoline, tetrahydroquinazoline, and pyrimidine derivatives and methods of treatment related to the use thereof HCRTR2, MCHR1, MCHR2 KLK7 4495/4885KMT2A 693/4885RAB9A 1648/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.