SCHEMBL6484141

SCHEMBL6484141

O=C(O)C(Cc1ccc(OCCn2c(=O)oc3cc(C(O)c4ccccc4)ccc32)cc1)C(=O)O

nearest known ligand 0.46

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
RAB9A P51151 3/20 0.46
TSHR P16473 2/20 0.45
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.45
ASAH1 Q13510 1/20 0.44
PLA2G4A P47712 3/20 0.44
PPARG P37231 5/20 0.43
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.43
LTA4H P09960 1/20 0.43
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.42
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.42
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.42
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 1/20 0.42
PPARA Q07869 4/20 0.42
PPARD Q03181 2/20 0.42
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.41
NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.41
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.41
TP53 P04637 1/20 0.40
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.40
POLB P06746 1/20 0.40

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6485878 0.92 PPARG (0.53) RAB9ATSHRSMN1; SMN2ASAH1PPARG
SCHEMBL6476311 0.85 SIGMAR1 (0.53) RAB9ATSHRSMN1; SMN2PLA2G4APPARG
SCHEMBL6477400 0.85 TSHR (0.62) RAB9ATSHRSMN1; SMN2PPARGALDH1A1
SCHEMBL6477277 0.84 PPARG (0.58) RAB9ATSHRSMN1; SMN2ASAH1PLA2G4A
SCHEMBL6487594 0.81 PPARG (0.62) RAB9ATSHRSMN1; SMN2PPARGALDH1A1
SCHEMBL6476013 0.78 PPARG (0.56) RAB9ATSHRSMN1; SMN2PPARGALDH1A1
SCHEMBL6475653 0.77 L3MBTL1 (0.56) RAB9ATSHRSMN1; SMN2PPARGALDH1A1
SCHEMBL6483665 0.76 PPARG (0.70) RAB9ATSHRSMN1; SMN2ASAH1PPARG
SCHEMBL6476791 0.75 L3MBTL1 (0.58) RAB9ATSHRSMN1; SMN2PPARGALDH1A1
SCHEMBL6475944 0.74 KDM4E (0.43) RAB9ATSHRSMN1; SMN2PLA2G4APPARG

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1252150-B1 HETEROCYCLIC DERIVATIVES, PREPARATION METHOD AND PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING SAME SERVIER LAB (FR) 2003-06-04 EP claimed
EP-1252150-A1 NOVEL HETEROCYCLIC DERIVATIVES, PREPARATION METHOD AND PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING SAME Les Laboratoires Servier (FR) 2002-10-30 EP claimed
WO-2001057002-A1 NOVEL HETEROCYCLIC DERIVATIVES, PREPARATION METHOD AND PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING SAME LES LABORATOIRES SERVIER (FR) 2001-08-09 WO claimed
US-6919362-B2 Heterocyclic derivatives, preparation method and pharmaceutical compositions containing same LES LABORATOIRES SERVIER (FR) 2005-07-19 US disclosed
US-20030040533-A1 Novel heterocyclic derivatives, preparation method and pharmaceutical compositions containing same LES LABORATOIRES SERVIER (FR) 2003-02-27 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030040533-A1 Novel heterocyclic derivatives, preparation method and pharmaceutical compositions containing same CYP2F1, CYP11B2, CYP4B1 RAB9A 3361/4885TSHR 844/4885SMN1; SMN2 1823/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.