SCHEMBL6521155

SCHEMBL6521155

CCCCCCCCCCCCC(C(=O)Nc1ccccc1)c1cccs1

nearest known ligand 0.49

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
HDAC8 Q9BY41 9/20 0.49
HDAC3 O15379 7/20 0.49
HDAC6 Q9UBN7 7/20 0.49
HDAC1 Q13547 6/20 0.49
HDAC2 Q92769 6/20 0.49
HDAC4 P56524 3/20 0.48
HDAC7 Q8WUI4 3/20 0.48
HDAC10 Q969S8 3/20 0.48
HDAC11 Q96DB2 3/20 0.48
HDAC9 Q9UKV0 3/20 0.48
HDAC5 Q9UQL6 3/20 0.48
LMNA P02545 2/20 0.47
TP53 P04637 1/20 0.47
POLB P06746 1/20 0.47
THRB P10828 1/20 0.47
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 1/20 0.47
ALDH1A1 P00352 3/20 0.47
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 2/20 0.47
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.47
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.47

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL9000597 0.83 HDAC1 (0.43) HDAC8HDAC3HDAC6HDAC1HDAC11
SCHEMBL9093734 0.83 HDAC1 (0.43) HDAC8HDAC3HDAC6HDAC1HDAC11
SCHEMBL9000645 0.79 ZDHHC7 (0.45) HDAC8HDAC3HDAC6HDAC1HDAC11
SCHEMBL3854654 0.78 ALDH1A1 (0.45) HDAC8HDAC3HDAC6HDAC1HDAC2
SCHEMBL27680341 0.78 HTT (0.44) HDAC8HDAC3HDAC6HDAC1HDAC11
SCHEMBL28170178 0.77 HTT (0.45) HDAC8HDAC3HDAC6HDAC1HDAC11
SCHEMBL9567286 0.76 HDAC1 (0.40) HDAC8HDAC3HDAC6HDAC1HDAC11
SCHEMBL1162571 0.76 HDAC2 (0.68) HDAC8HDAC3HDAC6HDAC1HDAC2
SCHEMBL13369426 0.76 HDAC2 (0.68) HDAC8HDAC3HDAC6HDAC1HDAC2
SCHEMBL20353846 0.76 HDAC8 (0.58) HDAC8HDAC3HDAC6HDAC1HDAC2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-6864246-B2 Anilide and cyclodextrin complexes, their preparation and their use as medicine in particular for treating dyslipidemiae PIERRE FABRE MEDICAMENT (FR) 2005-03-08 US claimed
US-20040127462-A1 Anilide and cyclodextrin complexes, their preparation and their use as medicine in particular for treating dyslipidemiae PIERRE FABRE MEDICAMENT (FR) 2004-07-01 US claimed
US-6864246-B2 Anilide and cyclodextrin complexes, their preparation and their use as medicine in particular for treating dyslipidemiae PIERRE FABRE MEDICAMENT (FR) 2005-03-08 US disclosed
US-20040127462-A1 Anilide and cyclodextrin complexes, their preparation and their use as medicine in particular for treating dyslipidemiae PIERRE FABRE MEDICAMENT (FR) 2004-07-01 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20040127462-A1 Anilide and cyclodextrin complexes, their preparation and their use as medicine in particular for treating dyslipidemiae APOB, HDLBP, PCSK9 HDAC8 954/4885HDAC3 274/4885HDAC6 297/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.