SCHEMBL6574329

SCHEMBL6574329

Cc1ccc(NS(=O)(=O)c2ccccc2)cc1N

nearest known ligand 0.63

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
FFAR4 Q5NUL3 4/20 0.63
KEAP1 Q14145 2/20 0.60
HTR6 P50406 1/20 0.59
CYTH2 Q99418 2/20 0.58
ALDH1A1 P00352 3/20 0.57
HTT P42858 1/20 0.57
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.57
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.57
PKM P14618 4/20 0.56
KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.56
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.56
IL1RN P18510 1/20 0.55
ERAP1 Q9NZ08 1/20 0.55
CA12 O43570 2/20 0.54
CA1 P00915 2/20 0.54
CA2 P00918 2/20 0.54
CA9 Q16790 2/20 0.54
GAA P10253 2/20 0.53
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.53
GLA P06280 1/20 0.53

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL10572974 0.87 FFAR4 (0.68) FFAR4KEAP1HTR6CYTH2ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL17102990 0.87 FFAR4 (0.63) FFAR4ALDH1A1HTTLMNASMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL14511010 0.86 KMT2A (0.58) FFAR4ALDH1A1HTTLMNASMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL8589428 0.85 FFAR4 (0.73) FFAR4KEAP1HTR6ALDH1A1LMNA
SCHEMBL30343351 0.85 PKM (0.69) FFAR4KEAP1CYTH2ALDH1A1HTT
SCHEMBL7577338 0.85 PKM (0.69) FFAR4KEAP1CYTH2ALDH1A1HTT
SCHEMBL11070041 0.84 KMT2A (0.60) KEAP1HTR6CYTH2ALDH1A1HTT
SCHEMBL13593633 0.84 KMT2A (0.55) FFAR4ALDH1A1LMNASMN1; SMN2PKM
Phenyl(Phenylsulfonyl)Amine SCHEMBL11498245 0.82 KEAP1 (0.67) FFAR4KEAP1HTR6CYTH2ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL22112961 0.81 FFAR4 (0.60) FFAR4KEAP1HTR6ALDH1A1LMNA

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1670790-B1 BENZIMIDAZOLE DERIVATIVES, COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING THEM, PREPARATION THEREOF AND USES THEREOF ASTRAZENECA AB (SE) 2008-08-20 EP disclosed
US-20040248897-A1 Substituted N-acylaniline derivatives, the preparation thereof, and their use as pharmaceutical compositions BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMA GMBH & CO. KG (DE) 2004-12-09 US disclosed
EP-1414790-A1 SUBSTITUTED N-ACYL ANILINE DERIVATIVES, PRODUCTION AND USE THEREOF AS MEDICAMENTS Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co.KG (DE) 2004-05-06 EP disclosed
WO-2003000653-A1 SUBSTITUTED N-ACYL ANILINE DERIVATIVES, PRODUCTION AND USE THEREOF AS MEDICAMENTS BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMA GMBH & CO.KG (DE) 2003-01-03 WO disclosed
US-3978040-A Process for the preparation of cyanoazo compounds by reacting halogenoazo compounds with CuCN in an aqueous media in the presence of a nitrogen base BAYER AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (DT) 1976-08-31 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20040248897-A1 Substituted N-acylaniline derivatives, the preparation thereof, and their use as pharmaceutical compositions NAT1, CYP3A5, CYP3A7 FFAR4 662/4885KEAP1 3010/4885HTR6 3371/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.