SCHEMBL684825

SCHEMBL684825

COc1ccc(O)c(C(=O)N/N=C/c2cc(Cl)cc(Cl)c2O)c1

nearest known ligand 0.64

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PIK3CG P48736 2/20 0.64
KDM4E B2RXH2 6/20 0.56
MEN1 O00255 5/20 0.56
KMT2A Q03164 5/20 0.56
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 2/20 0.56
TDP1 Q9NUW8 2/20 0.56
NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.56
USP2 O75604 1/20 0.56
MCOLN3 Q8TDD5 1/20 0.56
KDM1A O60341 1/20 0.52
MAPT P10636 5/20 0.51
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.51
GAA P10253 4/20 0.49
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.49
MGAM O43451 3/20 0.48
SI P14410 3/20 0.48
MGAM2 Q2M2H8 3/20 0.48
ATM Q13315 1/20 0.48
FADS1 O60427 1/20 0.48
GCGR P47871 1/20 0.48

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL685052 0.91 PIK3CG (0.74) PIK3CGKDM4EMEN1KMT2AL3MBTL1
SCHEMBL684820 0.86 PIK3CG (0.69) PIK3CGKDM4EMEN1KMT2AL3MBTL1
SCHEMBL683844 0.85 PIK3CG (0.83) PIK3CGKDM4EMEN1KMT2AL3MBTL1
SCHEMBL683742 0.85 KMT2A (0.69) PIK3CGKDM4EMEN1KMT2AL3MBTL1
SCHEMBL1638669 0.83 MAPT (0.64) KDM4EMEN1KMT2AL3MBTL1TDP1
SCHEMBL1638671 0.83 MAPT (0.64) KDM4EMEN1KMT2AL3MBTL1TDP1
SCHEMBL12767404 0.83 MAPT (0.64) KDM4EMEN1KMT2AL3MBTL1TDP1
SCHEMBL1638634 0.83 PIK3CG (0.61) PIK3CGKDM4EMEN1KMT2AL3MBTL1
SCHEMBL1638631 0.83 PIK3CG (0.61) PIK3CGKDM4EMEN1KMT2AL3MBTL1
SCHEMBL12766906 0.83 PIK3CG (0.61) PIK3CGKDM4EMEN1KMT2AL3MBTL1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8461078-B2 Fungicidal compositions including hydrazone derivatives and copper DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC (US) 2013-06-11 US disclosed
US-20120107416-A1 FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING HYDRAZONE DERIVATIVES AND COPPER DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC (US) 2012-05-03 US disclosed
US-20120010075-A1 SYNERGISTIC FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING HYDRAZONE DERIVATIVES AND COPPER DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC (US) 2012-01-12 US disclosed
US-20120010075-A1 SYNERGISTIC FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING HYDRAZONE DERIVATIVES AND COPPER DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC (US) 2012-01-12 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20120010075-A1 SYNERGISTIC FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING HYDRAZONE DERIVATIVES AND COPPER SOD1, CYP51A1, SOD3 PIK3CG 2876/4885KDM4E 1473/4885MEN1 536/4885
US-20120107416-A1 FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING HYDRAZONE DERIVATIVES AND COPPER SOD1, CYP51A1, CYP4Z1 PIK3CG 2911/4885KDM4E 1286/4885MEN1 508/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.