SCHEMBL7609801

SCHEMBL7609801

CCCCCCCC/C=C\CCCCCCCCN(CCCCCCCC/C=C\CCCCCCCC)S(=O)(=O)c1ccc(C)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.62

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
CNR2 P34972 8/20 0.58
MCHR1 Q99705 1/20 0.54
VCAM1 P19320 1/20 0.46
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 2/20 0.46
CA12 O43570 2/20 0.46
CA9 Q16790 2/20 0.46
CA2 P00918 1/20 0.46
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.46
SLC22A6 Q4U2R8 1/20 0.46
SLC22A8 Q8TCC7 1/20 0.46
ABCC2 Q92887 1/20 0.46
SLC22A12 Q96S37 1/20 0.46
UGT1A7 Q9HAW7 1/20 0.46
SLC22A11 Q9NSA0 1/20 0.46
SERPINE1 P05121 1/20 0.45
P4HB P07237 1/20 0.45
GLA P06280 1/20 0.44
POLB P06746 1/20 0.43
CA1 P00915 1/20 0.43
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.42

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL7609807 1.00 CNR2 (0.58) CNR2MCHR1VCAM1SMN1; SMN2CA12
SCHEMBL7611913 0.91 CNR2 (0.67) CNR2MCHR1VCAM1SMN1; SMN2CA12
SCHEMBL9307801 0.91 CNR2 (0.67) CNR2MCHR1VCAM1SMN1; SMN2CA12
SCHEMBL8101278 0.89 CNR2 (0.64) CNR2MCHR1VCAM1SMN1; SMN2CA12
SCHEMBL9351542 0.86 CNR2 (0.48) CNR2MCHR1SMN1; SMN2CA12CA9
SCHEMBL6490141 0.85 CNR2 (0.67) CNR2MCHR1SMN1; SMN2RAB9ASERPINE1
SCHEMBL3694171 0.85 CNR2 (0.58) CNR2MCHR1VCAM1SMN1; SMN2CA12
SCHEMBL7097469 0.82 CNR2 (0.59) CNR2MCHR1SMN1; SMN2CA12CA9
SCHEMBL14229013 0.82 CA9 (0.61) CNR2MCHR1VCAM1SMN1; SMN2CA12
SCHEMBL7092599 0.82 CNR2 (0.59) CNR2MCHR1SMN1; SMN2CA12CA9

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20020025920-A1 Novel lipid complexes for transferring at least one therapeutically active substance, in particular a polynucleotide, into a target cell, and use in gene therapy BISCHOFF RAINER (SE) 2002-02-28 US disclosed
US-6291423-B1 Lipid complexes for transferring at least a therapeutically active substance, in particular a polynucleotide into a target cell and use in gene therapy TRANSGENE S.A. (FR) 2001-09-18 US disclosed
EP-0956050-A1 NOVEL LIPID COMPLEXES FOR TRANSFERRING AT LEAST A THERAPEUTICALLY ACTIVE SUBSTANCE, IN PARTICULAR A POLYNUCLEOTIDE INTO A TARGET CELL AND USE IN GENE THERAPY TRANSGENE S.A. (FR) 1999-11-17 EP disclosed
WO-1998056423-A1 NOVEL LIPID COMPLEXES FOR TRANSFERRING AT LEAST A THERAPEUTICALLY ACTIVE SUBSTANCE, IN PARTICULAR A POLYNUCLEOTIDE INTO A TARGET CELL AND USE IN GENE THERAPY TRANSGENE S.A. (FR) 1998-12-17 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20020025920-A1 Novel lipid complexes for transferring at least one therapeutically active substance, in particular a polynucleotide, into a target cell, and use in gene therapy PCYT1A, PLTP, PITPNB CNR2 3147/4885MCHR1 2906/4885VCAM1 429/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.