SCHEMBL7933231

SCHEMBL7933231

COC(=O)c1scc(C)c1NC(=O)CS

nearest known ligand 0.65

Predicted protein targets (top 17)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
CYP1A2 P05177 2/20 0.65
CYP3A4 P08684 2/20 0.65
POLB P06746 2/20 0.65
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.65
MAPT P10636 3/20 0.58
PKM P14618 1/20 0.58
ATM Q13315 1/20 0.58
KDM4E B2RXH2 3/20 0.58
HTT P42858 1/20 0.58
HTR1A P08908 1/20 0.56
SCN1A P35498 1/20 0.56
SCN2A Q99250 1/20 0.56
SCN3A Q9NY46 1/20 0.56
GAA P10253 1/20 0.49
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.48
ALDH1A1 P00352 3/20 0.44
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.42

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL22692963 0.86 CYP1A2 (0.67) CYP1A2CYP3A4POLBCYP2C19MAPT
SCHEMBL12354789 0.85 CYP1A2 (0.49) CYP1A2CYP3A4POLBCYP2C19MAPT
SCHEMBL22664823 0.85 CYP1A2 (0.65) CYP1A2CYP3A4POLBCYP2C19MAPT
SCHEMBL10714710 0.85 CYP1A2 (0.65) CYP1A2CYP3A4POLBCYP2C19MAPT
Bromide SCHEMBL23295960 0.84 CYP1A2 (0.64) CYP1A2CYP3A4POLBCYP2C19MAPT
Phosphine SCHEMBL23295959 0.84 CYP1A2 (0.64) CYP1A2CYP3A4POLBCYP2C19MAPT
SCHEMBL23332711 0.82 CYP1A2 (0.62) CYP1A2CYP3A4POLBCYP2C19MAPT
SCHEMBL31531369 0.82 CYP1A2 (0.62) CYP1A2CYP3A4POLBCYP2C19MAPT
SCHEMBL31259544 0.82 CYP1A2 (0.62) CYP1A2CYP3A4POLBCYP2C19MAPT
SCHEMBL31538613 0.82 CYP1A2 (0.62) CYP1A2CYP3A4POLBCYP2C19MAPT

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20110034521-A1 COMPOUNDS AND METHODS FOR TREATING ZINC MATRIX METALLOPROTEASE DEPENDENT DISEASES NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (NIH), U.S. DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (DHHS), U.S. GOVERNMENT 2011-02-10 US disclosed
WO-2010033360-A1 METHODS OF TREATING A BOTULINUM TOXIN RELATED CONDITION IN A SUBJECT 1/3 ABSOLUTE SCIENCE, INC. (US) 2010-03-25 WO disclosed
WO-2009045761-A1 COMPOUNDS AND METHODS FOR TREATING ZINC MATRIX METALLOPROTEASE DEPENDENT DISEASES ABSOLUTE SCIENCE, INC. (US) 2009-04-09 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20110034521-A1 COMPOUNDS AND METHODS FOR TREATING ZINC MATRIX METALLOPROTEASE DEPENDENT DISEASES MMP7, MMP3, MMP9 CYP1A2 1547/4885CYP3A4 3370/4885POLB 1320/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.