SCHEMBL800480

SCHEMBL800480

CC(C)C(NC(=O)OC(C)(C)C)c1nc(C(=O)O)co1

nearest known ligand 0.49

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
C3AR1 Q16581 2/20 0.49
LMNA P02545 4/20 0.45
ABCB1 P08183 4/20 0.43
HSD17B10 Q99714 3/20 0.43
TSHR P16473 4/20 0.41
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.41
MAPK1 P28482 2/20 0.41
KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.41
PPARG P37231 1/20 0.41
NCOA2 Q15596 1/20 0.41
NCOA1 Q15788 1/20 0.41
NCOA3 Q9Y6Q9 1/20 0.41
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.41
MAPT P10636 2/20 0.39
MITF O75030 1/20 0.39
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.39
HTT P42858 1/20 0.39
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 1/20 0.39
TRPA1 O75762 1/20 0.39
CA1 P00915 1/20 0.38

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL800483 0.89 C3AR1 (0.42) C3AR1LMNAABCB1HSD17B10TSHR
SCHEMBL800482 0.89 C3AR1 (0.46) C3AR1LMNAABCB1HSD17B10TSHR
SCHEMBL22636119 0.88 C3AR1 (0.62) C3AR1LMNAABCB1HSD17B10TSHR
SCHEMBL22636117 0.88 C3AR1 (0.62) C3AR1LMNAABCB1HSD17B10TSHR
SCHEMBL800492 0.87 KMT2A (0.49) C3AR1LMNAABCB1HSD17B10TSHR
SCHEMBL15214453 0.84 C3AR1 (0.43) C3AR1LMNAHSD17B10TSHRALDH1A1
SCHEMBL801031 0.84 C3AR1 (0.49) C3AR1LMNAABCB1HSD17B10TSHR
SCHEMBL16602128 0.81 C3AR1 (0.49) C3AR1LMNAHSD17B10TSHRALDH1A1
SCHEMBL10072664 0.81 LMNA (0.46) C3AR1LMNAABCB1HSD17B10TSHR
SCHEMBL12980652 0.81 C3AR1 (0.49) C3AR1LMNAHSD17B10TSHRALDH1A1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 10 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8729060-B2 Macrocyclic polyoxazole compounds and use thereof RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY (US) 2014-05-20 US disclosed
US-8729060-B2 Macrocyclic polyoxazole compounds and use thereof RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY (US) 2014-05-20 US disclosed
US-8518928-B2 Therapeutic compounds RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY (US) 2013-08-27 US disclosed
US-8518928-B2 Therapeutic compounds RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY (US) 2013-08-27 US disclosed
US-20120071527-A1 THERAPEUTIC COMPOUNDS UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY (US) 2012-03-22 US disclosed
US-8093235-B2 Macrocyclic compounds which stabilize G-Quadruplex DNA and RNA RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY (US) 2012-01-10 US disclosed
US-20110230531-A1 THERAPEUTIC COMPOUNDS NIH - DEITR 2011-09-22 US disclosed
US-20090156627-A1 THERAPEUTIC COMPOUNDS NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH - DIRECTOR DEITR 2009-06-18 US disclosed
WO-2009018549-A1 THERAPEUTIC COMPOUNDS RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY (US) 2009-02-05 WO disclosed
WO-2008009942-A1 HETEROAROMATIC-BASED PEPTIDE MACROCYCLES AS G-QUADRUPLEX LIGANDS CAMBRIDGE ENTERPRISE LTD. (GB) 2008-01-24 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (3 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090156627-A1 THERAPEUTIC COMPOUNDS TOP2B, DDB1, RECQL C3AR1 2510/4885LMNA 427/4885ABCB1 260/4885
US-20120071527-A1 THERAPEUTIC COMPOUNDS TOP2B, DDB1, TOP1 C3AR1 2841/4885LMNA 442/4885ABCB1 249/4885
US-20110230531-A1 THERAPEUTIC COMPOUNDS MCL1, MKI67, NCL C3AR1 1661/4885LMNA 243/4885ABCB1 22/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.