SCHEMBL9924384

SCHEMBL9924384

COc1ccc(Cc2cnc3ccc(-c4ccccc4)nn23)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.65

Predicted protein targets (top 12)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
MET P08581 4/20 0.65
FYN P06241 12/20 0.51
NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.50
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.50
STAT1 P42224 1/20 0.50
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.50
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.50
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.50
TNF P01375 1/20 0.46
AURKA O14965 1/20 0.45
CYP11B1 P15538 1/20 0.44
CYP11B2 P19099 1/20 0.44

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL9924381 0.89 FYN (0.52) METFYN
SCHEMBL9924383 0.87 FYN (0.50) METFYNNPC1RAB9ASMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL9924371 0.84 MET (0.74) METFYNCYP11B1CYP11B2
SCHEMBL1657795 0.84 MET (0.63) METFYNTNF
SCHEMBL9924380 0.84 FYN (0.56) METFYN
SCHEMBL9924377 0.84 MET (0.63) METFYN
SCHEMBL1657174 0.81 MET (0.70) MET
SCHEMBL3411320 0.80 ALDH1A1 (0.44) METFYNALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2TNF
SCHEMBL9910360 0.79 MET (1.00) MET
SCHEMBL9924372 0.77 MET (0.68) METFYN

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20130303529-A1 FUSED HETEROCYCLIC DERIVATIVES AND METHODS OF USE AMGEN INC (US) 2013-11-14 US disclosed
US-8524900-B2 Fused heterocyclic derivatives and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2013-09-03 US disclosed
US-20120148531-A1 FUSED HETEROCYCLIC DERIVATIVES AND METHODS OF USE AMGEN INC. (US) 2012-06-14 US disclosed
US-20120107275-A1 FUSED HETEROCYCLIC DERIVATIVES AND METHODS OF USE AMGEN INC. (US) 2012-05-03 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (3 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20120148531-A1 FUSED HETEROCYCLIC DERIVATIVES AND METHODS OF USE HGF, HGFAC, MET MET 3/4885FYN 177/4885NPC1 287/4885
US-20130303529-A1 FUSED HETEROCYCLIC DERIVATIVES AND METHODS OF USE HGF, HGFAC, MET MET 3/4885FYN 177/4885NPC1 287/4885
US-20120107275-A1 FUSED HETEROCYCLIC DERIVATIVES AND METHODS OF USE HGF, HGFAC, MET MET 3/4885FYN 177/4885NPC1 287/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.