Bicarbonate

Bicarbonate

SCHEMBL9950130

O.O=C([O-])[O-].O=C([O-])[O-].[Ni+2].[Ni+2].[Ni+2].[OH-].[OH-]

nearest known ligand 0.42

Full drug profile on Sugi Atlas →

Known targets — ChEMBL curated mechanism

GSK3AGSK3BIMPA1

The experimentally established mechanism targets of Bicarbonate. The predicted profile below is derived independently by chemical similarity — agreement is a validation signal, a miss is honest.

Predicted protein targets (top 9)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
CA4 P22748 5/20 0.42
CA1 P00915 2/20 0.42
FAHD1 Q6P587 1/20 0.42
LMNA P02545 2/20 0.33
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.33
LDHA P00338 1/20 0.33
BLM P54132 1/20 0.33
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.33
CASP1 P29466 1/20 0.31

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
Bicarbonate SCHEMBL2023098 1.00 CA4 (0.42) CA4CA1FAHD1LMNAMEN1
Bicarbonate SCHEMBL6580033 1.00 CA4 (0.42) CA4CA1FAHD1LMNAMEN1
Bicarbonate SCHEMBL7719205 1.00 CA4 (0.42) CA4CA1FAHD1LMNAMEN1
Bicarbonate SCHEMBL14563550 0.95
Bicarbonate SCHEMBL5189020 0.95 CA4 (0.39) CA4CA1FAHD1LMNAMEN1
Bicarbonate SCHEMBL9012479 0.94
Bicarbonate SCHEMBL472826 0.94 CA4 (0.46) CA4CA1FAHD1LMNAMEN1
Bicarbonate SCHEMBL28897502 0.94 CA4 (0.46) CA4CA1FAHD1LMNAMEN1
Bicarbonate SCHEMBL231029 0.94 CA4 (0.46) CA4CA1FAHD1LMNAMEN1
Bicarbonate SCHEMBL2953263 0.94

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 7 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20170077403-A1 METHOD FOR FABRICATING LARGE METAL NANOFIBER ELECTRODE ARRAY USING ALIGNED METAL NANOFIBER POSTECH ACADEMY- INDUSTRY FOUNDATION (KR) 2017-03-16 US claimed
US-20170077403-A1 METHOD FOR FABRICATING LARGE METAL NANOFIBER ELECTRODE ARRAY USING ALIGNED METAL NANOFIBER POSTECH ACADEMY- INDUSTRY FOUNDATION (KR) 2017-03-16 US disclosed
US-20160374209-A1 METHOD OF FABRICATING METAL NANOWIRE PATTERN POSTECH ACADEMY - INDUSTRY FOUNDATION (KP) 2016-12-22 US disclosed
US-9353025-B2 Process for selective removal of acetylenes from gaseous streams TPC GROUP LLC (US) 2016-05-31 US disclosed
US-20150315107-A1 Process for Selective Removal of Acetylenes from Gaseous Streams TPC GROUP LLC 2015-11-05 US disclosed
US-9115038-B2 Process for selective removal of acetylenes from gaseous streams TPC GROUP LLC (US) 2015-08-25 US disclosed
US-20120164048-A1 PROCESS FOR SELECTIVE REMOVAL OF ACETYLENES FROM GASEOUS STREAMS TPC GROUP LLC 2012-06-28 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20150315107-A1 Process for Selective Removal of Acetylenes from Gaseous Streams FAR1, ACSL4, TECR CA4 1909/4885CA1 3843/4885FAHD1 631/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.