SCHEMBL9974879

SCHEMBL9974879

CCC1CC(C)CN(CCNCCC(c2ccccc2)c2ccccc2)C1

nearest known ligand 0.42

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
SIGMAR1 Q99720 2/20 0.42
KCNH2 Q12809 3/20 0.41
CYP2D6 P10635 2/20 0.40
ALDH1A1 P00352 3/20 0.39
MEN1 O00255 2/20 0.39
KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.39
GAA P10253 1/20 0.39
HTR2A P28223 1/20 0.39
HRH1 P35367 1/20 0.39
PRMT6 Q96LA8 2/20 0.37
CARM1 Q86X55 1/20 0.36
CYP3A4 P08684 2/20 0.36
OPRM1 P35372 2/20 0.36
DRD3 P35462 2/20 0.36
CHRM2 P08172 1/20 0.36
HTR1A P08908 1/20 0.36
ADRA2A P08913 1/20 0.36
ADORA3 P0DMS8 1/20 0.36
CHRM1 P11229 1/20 0.36
SMPD1 P17405 1/20 0.36

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL1780475 0.90 SIGMAR1 (0.48) SIGMAR1KCNH2CYP2D6ALDH1A1MEN1
SCHEMBL172251 0.78 POLB (0.49) SIGMAR1KCNH2CYP2D6ALDH1A1HTR2A
SCHEMBL125814 0.71 SIGMAR1 (0.59) SIGMAR1KCNH2ALDH1A1HRH3
SCHEMBL24438403 0.71 HRH3 (0.56) SIGMAR1LMNAHRH3POLB
SCHEMBL11796932 0.69 KCNH2 (0.76) SIGMAR1KCNH2CYP2D6ALDH1A1MEN1
SCHEMBL128328 0.69 KCNH2 (0.49) SIGMAR1KCNH2HTR2AHRH1OPRM1
SCHEMBL128071 0.69 ACHE (0.57) SIGMAR1KCNH2CYP2D6ALDH1A1MEN1
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL126742 0.68 ACHE (0.56) KCNH2CYP2D6ALDH1A1MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL3637324 0.68 KCNH2 (0.63) SIGMAR1KCNH2CYP2D6ALDH1A1MEN1
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL11794831 0.67 KCNH2 (0.73) SIGMAR1KCNH2CYP2D6ALDH1A1MEN1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8268894-B2 Compositions and methods for the treatment of infectious diseases THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (US) 2012-09-18 US disclosed
US-8202910-B2 Compositions and methods for treatment of infectious disease SEQUELLA, INC. (US) 2012-06-19 US disclosed
US-20110118307-A1 Compositions and methods for the treatment of infectious diseases GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES 2011-05-19 US disclosed
US-20090192173-A1 ANTI-TUBERCULAR DRUGS: COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS SEQUELLA, INC. 2009-07-30 US disclosed
US-7456222-B2 Anti tubercular drug: compositions and methods SEQUELLA, INC. (US) 2008-11-25 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20110118307-A1 Compositions and methods for the treatment of infectious diseases TERT, C5, ELANE SIGMAR1 4624/4885KCNH2 3808/4885CYP2D6 2265/4885
US-20090192173-A1 ANTI-TUBERCULAR DRUGS: COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS RIF1, TERT, ELL SIGMAR1 3044/4885KCNH2 2650/4885CYP2D6 446/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.