SCHEMBL9975603

SCHEMBL9975603

CCOC(=O)c1cccc(N(C)c2csc(-c3ccccc3)n2)c1

nearest known ligand 0.49

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 4/20 0.47
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.47
RARA P10276 1/20 0.46
RARB P10826 1/20 0.46
RARG P13631 1/20 0.46
MAPT P10636 3/20 0.46
RAB9A P51151 5/20 0.44
NPC1 O15118 4/20 0.44
ALDH1A1 P00352 3/20 0.44
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.44
CDC7 O00311 2/20 0.44
DBF4 Q9UBU7 2/20 0.44
TRPM8 Q7Z2W7 1/20 0.44
TP53 P04637 1/20 0.43
PKM P14618 1/20 0.43
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.43
NFKB1 P19838 1/20 0.43
NFKB2 Q00653 1/20 0.43
RELA Q04206 1/20 0.43
HSD17B10 Q99714 1/20 0.43

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL8238620 0.88 RARA (0.54) SMN1; SMN2RARARARBRARGMAPT
SCHEMBL16180612 0.81 SMN1; SMN2 (0.59) SMN1; SMN2MAPK1RARARARBRARG
SCHEMBL9975608 0.79 TRPM8 (0.46) SMN1; SMN2MAPK1RARARARBRARG
SCHEMBL8239693 0.78 RARA (0.53) SMN1; SMN2RARARARBRARGMAPT
SCHEMBL8239864 0.77 RARA (0.52) SMN1; SMN2RARARARBRARGMAPT
SCHEMBL9975605 0.77 MAPT (0.48) SMN1; SMN2RARARARBRARGMAPT
SCHEMBL9975604 0.77 RARA (0.51) SMN1; SMN2RARARARBRARGMAPT
SCHEMBL9975611 0.76 SREBF2 (0.46) SMN1; SMN2MAPK1MAPTRAB9ANPC1
SCHEMBL8242411 0.75 MAPT (0.51) RARARARBRARGMAPTRAB9A
SCHEMBL4926537 0.73 CYP4F2 (0.52) SMN1; SMN2MAPK1MAPTRAB9ANPC1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8394798-B2 Compositions and methods for inducing neuronal differentiation THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE (US) 2013-03-12 US disclosed
US-20120157457-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR INDUCING NEURONAL DIFFERENTIATION THE SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES (US) 2012-06-21 US disclosed
US-20120157457-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR INDUCING NEURONAL DIFFERENTIATION THE SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES (US) 2012-06-21 US disclosed
US-8105581-B2 Compositions and methods for inducing neuronal differentiation THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE (US) 2012-01-31 US disclosed
US-20100166710-A1 Compositions and Methods for Inducing Neuronal Differentiation THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE (US) 2010-07-01 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100166710-A1 Compositions and Methods for Inducing Neuronal Differentiation CHAT, DCX, GAP43 SMN1; SMN2 115/4885MAPK1 2190/4885RARA 163/4885
US-20120157457-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR INDUCING NEURONAL DIFFERENTIATION CHAT, DCX, GAP43 SMN1; SMN2 115/4885MAPK1 2190/4885RARA 163/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.