Predicted protein targets (top 4)
| gene | UniProt | supporting neighbours | confidence | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ | L3MBTL1 | Q9Y468 | 2/20 | 0.36 |
| ▸ | LMNA | P02545 | 1/20 | 0.36 |
| ▸ | MAPT | P10636 | 1/20 | 0.36 |
| ▸ | PKM | P14618 | 1/20 | 0.35 |
Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.
Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules
Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.
| Compound | similarity | top predicted | shared targets | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHEMBL10270637 | 0.83 | L3MBTL1 (0.32) | L3MBTL1 | |
| SCHEMBL10271153 | 0.77 | L3MBTL1 (0.33) | L3MBTL1LMNAMAPTPKM | |
| SCHEMBL10271162 | 0.74 | ALDH1A1 (0.37) | LMNAMAPT | |
| SCHEMBL10271360 | 0.69 | L3MBTL1 (0.35) | L3MBTL1LMNAMAPTPKM | |
| SCHEMBL10287302 | 0.69 | — | — | |
| SCHEMBL10270754 | 0.68 | HTT (0.37) | LMNAMAPT | |
| SCHEMBL10270636 | 0.68 | — | — | |
| SCHEMBL10271358 | 0.68 | L3MBTL1 (0.34) | L3MBTL1LMNAMAPTPKM | |
| SCHEMBL10270635 | 0.68 | RAB9A (0.30) | — | |
| SCHEMBL10270996 | 0.66 | — | — |
Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.
Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them
Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.
| Patent | Title | Assignee | Published | Priority | Filing | Country | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| US-20140162980-A1 | NOVEL MICROBIOCIDAL DIOXIME ETHER DERIVATIVES | SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION LLC (US) | 2014-06-12 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| US-20140162980-A1 | NOVEL MICROBIOCIDAL DIOXIME ETHER DERIVATIVES | SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION LLC (US) | 2014-06-12 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| WO-2012013754-A1 | NOVEL MICROBIOCIDAL DIOXIME ETHER DERIVATIVES | SYNGENTA PARTICIPATIONS AG (CH) | 2012-02-02 | — | — | WO | disclosed |
Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?
For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.
| Patent | Title | Text reads most about | Predicted target · text-rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| US-20140162980-A1 | NOVEL MICROBIOCIDAL DIOXIME ETHER DERIVATIVES | PRDX4, PRDX6, DDT | L3MBTL1 773/4885LMNA 4570/4885MAPT 4671/4885 |
“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.