SCHEMBL1102437

SCHEMBL1102437

CC(C)c1cccc2c1c1ccccc1p2-c1ccccc1

nearest known ligand 0.34

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ GABRA1 P14867 3/20 0.34
▸ LMNA P02545 3/20 0.34
▸ GABRB2 P47870 2/20 0.34
▸ GABRG2 P18507 2/20 0.34
▸ GABRB3 P28472 2/20 0.34
▸ TSHR P16473 2/20 0.34
▸ FAAH O00519 1/20 0.34
▸ CA1 P00915 1/20 0.34
▸ CA2 P00918 1/20 0.34
▸ CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.34
▸ CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.34
▸ HPGD P15428 1/20 0.34
▸ GABRB1 P18505 1/20 0.34
▸ PTGS1 P23219 1/20 0.34
▸ SLC6A2 P23975 1/20 0.34
▸ HTR2C P28335 1/20 0.34
▸ GABRA5 P31644 1/20 0.34
▸ GABRA3 P34903 1/20 0.34
▸ HTR2B P41595 1/20 0.34
▸ GABRA2 P47869 1/20 0.34

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL10072420 0.79 CYP1A2 (0.39) LMNATSHRCYP1A2HPGDKMT2A
SCHEMBL13540497 0.74 — —
SCHEMBL753503 0.66 KDM4E (0.30) CYP1A2HPGDKMT2AALDH1A1
SCHEMBL18566115 0.66 NQO2 (0.44) GABRA1GABRB2GABRG2GABRB3HPGD
SCHEMBL22707369 0.65 — —
SCHEMBL18566130 0.65 ALKBH5 (0.44) GABRA1LMNAGABRB2GABRG2GABRB3
SCHEMBL22705951 0.64 ALDH1A1 (0.35) TSHRCYP1A2CYP3A4HPGDHIF1A
SCHEMBL4657600 0.64 GABRA1 (0.57) GABRA1LMNAGABRB2GABRG2GABRB3
SCHEMBL22705956 0.64 PRKDC (0.32) —
SCHEMBL30381967 0.64 GABRA1 (0.57) GABRA1LMNAGABRB2GABRG2GABRB3

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 12 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8153279-B2 Organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2012-04-10 — — US disclosed
US-7888863-B2 Organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2011-02-15 — — US disclosed
US-7888863-B2 Organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2011-02-15 — — US disclosed
US-20100096982-A1 Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electrouminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2010-04-22 — — US disclosed
US-20100096982-A1 Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electrouminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2010-04-22 — — US disclosed
US-20100051106-A1 Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2010-03-04 — — US disclosed
US-20100051106-A1 Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2010-03-04 — — US disclosed
US-20100033083-A1 Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2010-02-11 — — US disclosed
US-20090273278-A1 Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2009-11-05 — — US disclosed
US-20090273278-A1 Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2009-11-05 — — US disclosed
US-20090260686-A1 Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2009-10-22 — — US disclosed
US-20090260686-A1 Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2009-10-22 — — US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (5 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090260686-A1 Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same OCIAD1, OCIAD2, FZD7 GABRA1 4122/4885LMNA 3061/4885GABRB2 4163/4885
US-20100096982-A1 Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electrouminescent device using the same OCIAD1, OR10J3, ORMDL3 GABRA1 4338/4885LMNA 3666/4885GABRB2 4459/4885
US-20100051106-A1 Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same RPL36, RPL39, RPL36A GABRA1 1575/4885LMNA 4186/4885GABRB2 1158/4885
US-20090273278-A1 Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same OCIAD1, OCIAD2, ORMDL3 GABRA1 4272/4885LMNA 3600/4885GABRB2 4509/4885
US-20100033083-A1 Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same ORMDL3, OCIAD2, OCIAD1 GABRA1 3359/4885LMNA 2738/4885GABRB2 3267/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback