SCHEMBL1103608

SCHEMBL1103608

c1ccc2c(c1)CCc1ccccc1N2c1c2ccccc2c(-c2cccc3ccccc23)c2c1cnc1ccccc12

nearest known ligand 0.35

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
POLB P06746 1/20 0.35
KDM4E B2RXH2 4/20 0.34
CYP1A2 P05177 2/20 0.34
CYP2C9 P11712 2/20 0.34
CYP2C19 P33261 2/20 0.34
HTT P42858 2/20 0.34
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.34
GPR3 P46089 1/20 0.33
BCHE P06276 2/20 0.32
ACHE P22303 2/20 0.32
MET P08581 1/20 0.32
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 2/20 0.32
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.32
CYP2D6 P10635 1/20 0.31
FPR1 P21462 1/20 0.31
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 1/20 0.31
GPR55 Q9Y2T6 1/20 0.31
PDE10A Q9Y233 1/20 0.31
CDK4 P11802 1/20 0.31
CCND1 P24385 1/20 0.31

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL1103612 0.85 POLB (0.35) POLBKDM4EGPR3SMN1; SMN2NPSR1
SCHEMBL1103607 0.85 BCHE (0.36) POLBKDM4ECYP1A2CYP2C19CYP3A4
SCHEMBL1103602 0.84 PDE10A (0.33) POLBKDM4EGPR3BCHEMET
SCHEMBL1103611 0.84 MEN1 (0.37) POLBKDM4EGPR3METCDK4
SCHEMBL1103442 0.83 TLR7 (0.35) POLBKDM4ECYP1A2CYP2C9CYP2C19
SCHEMBL1103323 0.83 MPO (0.35) POLBKDM4EHTTGPR3SMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL1103555 0.82 MET (0.39) KDM4EHTTGPR3METSMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL1103603 0.79 KDM4E (0.36) KDM4EGPR3METSMN1; SMN2LMNA
SCHEMBL1103247 0.79 KDM4E (0.46) KDM4ECYP1A2CYP3A4GPR3SMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL1102915 0.78 TNF (0.40) POLBKDM4ECYP1A2CYP2C9CYP2C19

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8153279-B2 Organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2012-04-10 US disclosed
US-8153279-B2 Organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2012-04-10 US disclosed
US-20100033083-A1 Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2010-02-11 US disclosed
US-20100033083-A1 Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2010-02-11 US disclosed
EP-2147962-A1 Azaanthracene-derivatives and organic electroluminescent device using the same Gracel Display Inc. (KR) 2010-01-27 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100033083-A1 Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same ORMDL3, OCIAD2, OCIAD1 POLB 2825/4885KDM4E 3367/4885CYP1A2 1437/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.