SCHEMBL11670965

SCHEMBL11670965

Nc1ccc(/N=N/c2c(N)ccc3cc(S(=O)(=O)O)cc(O)c23)c(S(=O)(=O)O)c1

nearest known ligand 0.73

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ APEX1 P27695 2/20 0.73
▸ ENPP2 Q13822 5/20 0.71
▸ SUMO2 P61956 2/20 0.60
▸ SUMO1 P63165 2/20 0.60
▸ SENP7 Q9BQF6 2/20 0.60
▸ SENP2 Q9HC62 2/20 0.60
▸ CYP1A2 P05177 2/20 0.54
▸ NT5E P21589 2/20 0.52
▸ PRMT1 Q99873 2/20 0.50
▸ MAPK1 P28482 2/20 0.49
▸ ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.49
▸ SENP3 Q9H4L4 1/20 0.47
▸ SENP1 Q9P0U3 1/20 0.47
▸ MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.47
▸ HTT P42858 1/20 0.47
▸ KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.47
▸ CASP6 P55212 2/20 0.46
▸ NSD2 O96028 1/20 0.46
▸ DUSP3 P51452 1/20 0.46
▸ PTPN5 P54829 1/20 0.46

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6346835 1.00 APEX1 (0.73) APEX1ENPP2SUMO2SUMO1SENP7
SCHEMBL11670482 1.00 APEX1 (0.73) APEX1ENPP2SUMO2SUMO1SENP7
SCHEMBL11670471 0.99 APEX1 (0.72) APEX1ENPP2SUMO2SUMO1SENP7
SCHEMBL11849783 0.91 APEX1 (0.60) APEX1ENPP2SUMO2SUMO1SENP7
SCHEMBL11849768 0.91 APEX1 (0.60) APEX1ENPP2SUMO2SUMO1SENP7
SCHEMBL13763516 0.89 ENPP2 (0.69) APEX1ENPP2SUMO2SUMO1SENP7
SCHEMBL11226640 0.87 ENPP2 (0.67) APEX1ENPP2SUMO2SUMO1SENP7
SCHEMBL11226638 0.87 ENPP2 (0.67) APEX1ENPP2SUMO2SUMO1SENP7
SCHEMBL11760582 0.87 APEX1 (0.61) APEX1ENPP2SUMO2SUMO1SENP7
SCHEMBL11760573 0.87 APEX1 (0.61) APEX1ENPP2SUMO2SUMO1SENP7

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 12 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-2334281-B1 HAIR TREATMENT METHODS PERACHEM LTD (GB) 2014-12-17 — — EP disclosed
EP-1792001-B1 SHADING PROCESS BASF SE (DE) 2013-01-23 — — EP disclosed
US-8277519-B2 Hair treatment methods PERACHEM LIMITED (GB) 2012-10-02 — — US disclosed
US-20110189116-A1 HAIR TREATMENT METHODS PERACHEM LIMITED (GB) 2011-08-04 — — US disclosed
US-20100299849-A1 SHADING PROCESS HOEHENER ALFRED 2010-12-02 — — US disclosed
US-20100299849-A1 SHADING PROCESS HOEHENER ALFRED 2010-12-02 — — US disclosed
US-7799098-B2 Shading process CIBA SPECIALTY CHEMICALS CORP. (US) 2010-09-21 — — US disclosed
US-7799098-B2 Shading process CIBA SPECIALTY CHEMICALS CORP. (US) 2010-09-21 — — US disclosed
US-20090105108-A1 Shading Process CIBA CORPORATION 2009-04-23 — — US disclosed
US-20090105108-A1 Shading Process CIBA CORPORATION 2009-04-23 — — US disclosed
US-4061627-A COMPLEMENT INHIBITORS AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY (US) 1977-12-06 — — US disclosed
US-4008320-A Amidophenyl-azo-naphthalenesulfonic complement inhibitors and method of use thereof AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY (US) 1977-02-15 — — US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20110189116-A1 HAIR TREATMENT METHODS TST, POLR1C, NACA APEX1 299/4885ENPP2 4569/4885SUMO2 3100/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback