Predicted protein targets (top 17)
| gene | UniProt | supporting neighbours | confidence | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ | ITGA4 | P13612 | 2/20 | 0.52 |
| ▸ | ITGB7 | P26010 | 2/20 | 0.52 |
| ▸ | CTSS | P25774 | 1/20 | 0.52 |
| ▸ | CTSK | P43235 | 1/20 | 0.52 |
| ▸ | LY96 | Q9Y6Y9 | 1/20 | 0.52 |
| ▸ | ESR1 | P03372 | 1/20 | 0.47 |
| ▸ | ESR2 | Q92731 | 1/20 | 0.47 |
| ▸ | FOLH1 | Q04609 | 1/20 | 0.45 |
| ▸ | MDM4 | O15151 | 1/20 | 0.44 |
| ▸ | MDM2 | Q00987 | 1/20 | 0.44 |
| ▸ | POLB | P06746 | 1/20 | 0.43 |
| ▸ | MAPT | P10636 | 1/20 | 0.43 |
| ▸ | TDP1 | Q9NUW8 | 1/20 | 0.43 |
| ▸ | KMT2A | Q03164 | 1/20 | 0.42 |
| ▸ | NPSR1 | Q6W5P4 | 1/20 | 0.42 |
| ▸ | NAALAD2 | Q9Y3Q0 | 1/20 | 0.42 |
| ▸ | TSHR | P16473 | 1/20 | 0.41 |
Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.
Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules
Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.
| Compound | similarity | top predicted | shared targets | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHEMBL14139327 | 0.91 | ITGA4 (0.52) | ITGA4ITGB7CTSSCTSKLY96 | |
| SCHEMBL31622755 | 0.90 | ITGA4 (0.51) | ITGA4ITGB7CTSSCTSKLY96 | |
| SCHEMBL27494388 | 0.89 | CTSS (0.48) | ITGA4ITGB7CTSSCTSKLY96 | |
| SCHEMBL10604728 | 0.89 | CTSS (0.48) | ITGA4ITGB7CTSSCTSKLY96 | |
| SCHEMBL25798312 | 0.88 | ITGA4 (0.65) | ITGA4ITGB7CTSSCTSKPOLB | |
| SCHEMBL12174101 | 0.87 | ITGA4 (0.55) | ITGA4ITGB7LY96KMT2A | |
| SCHEMBL7369588 | 0.87 | LY96 (0.49) | ITGA4ITGB7CTSSCTSKLY96 | |
| SCHEMBL27307046 | 0.87 | LY96 (0.49) | ITGA4ITGB7CTSSCTSKLY96 | |
| SCHEMBL19354815 | 0.87 | CTSS (0.53) | ITGA4ITGB7CTSSCTSKLY96 | |
| Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL7953381 | 0.86 | LY96 (0.48) | ITGA4ITGB7CTSSCTSKLY96 |
Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.
Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them
Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.
| Patent | Title | Assignee | Published | Priority | Filing | Country | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| US-7612166-B2 | Fluorous capping reagents and methods for peptide purification | TRUSTEES OF TUFTS COLLEGE (US) | 2009-11-03 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| US-20080275216-A1 | Fluorous Capping Reagents and Methods for Peptide Purification | TRUSTEES OF TUFTS COLLEGE (US) | 2008-11-06 | — | — | US | disclosed |
Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?
For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.
| Patent | Title | Text reads most about | Predicted target · text-rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| US-20080275216-A1 | Fluorous Capping Reagents and Methods for Peptide Purification | DNPEP, ANPEP, RNGTT | ITGA4 1743/4885ITGB7 1642/4885CTSS 626/4885 |
“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.