SCHEMBL13627009

SCHEMBL13627009

CC(C)(C)c1cc(-c2cc(C(C)(C)C)cc(C(C)(C)C)c2OPOc2ccc3ccccc3c2)c(OPOc2ccc3ccccc3c2)c(C(C)(C)C)c1

nearest known ligand 0.38

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
CYP1A2 P05177 2/20 0.38
CYP2A6 P11509 1/20 0.38
NPC1 O15118 2/20 0.32
KDM4E B2RXH2 2/20 0.32
GAA P10253 1/20 0.32
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.32
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.32
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.32
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.32
AGXT P21549 2/20 0.32
LMNA P02545 2/20 0.31
ENPP3 O14638 1/20 0.31
ALPL P05186 1/20 0.31
ENPP1 P22413 1/20 0.31
XIAP P98170 1/20 0.31
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.31
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.31
CYP2C9 P11712 1/20 0.31
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.31
HSP90AA1 P07900 1/20 0.31

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL14586980 0.87 CYP1A2 (0.35) CYP1A2NPC1RAB9ALMNAALDH1A1
SCHEMBL13626998 0.85 CYP1A2 (0.47) CYP1A2CYP2A6NPC1RAB9ALMNA
SCHEMBL13626997 0.85 LMNA (0.33) CYP1A2NPC1MEN1KMT2ALMNA
SCHEMBL7205130 0.80 CYP1A2 (0.37) CYP1A2CYP2A6NPC1KDM4EGAA
SCHEMBL13627006 0.78 ALDH1A1 (0.37) KDM4EGAAHPGDALDH1A1MAPK1
SCHEMBL13627002 0.78 CYP2A6 (0.38) CYP1A2CYP2A6KDM4EGAAHPGD
SCHEMBL14452692 0.77 KIF11 (0.36) CYP1A2NPC1RAB9ALMNAALPL
SCHEMBL19754873 0.75 CA1 (0.33) CYP1A2NPC1KDM4EHPGDRAB9A
SCHEMBL14452690 0.74 HSP90AA1 (0.36) HSP90AA1
SCHEMBL16705219 0.73 CYP2A6 (0.58) CYP1A2CYP2A6KDM4EGAAMEN1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-7615645-B2 Method for the continuous production of aldehydes BASF AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (DE) 2009-11-10 US disclosed
US-7241857-B2 Method for producing allyl compound, and ether or ester compound produced thereby MITSUBISHI CHEMICAL CORPORATION (JP) 2007-07-10 US disclosed
US-20070083066-A1 Method for the production of 1,7-octadiene and use thereof BASF AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (DE) 2007-04-12 US disclosed
US-7173157-B2 Method for producing an allyl compound MITSUBISHI CHEMICAL CORPORATION (JP) 2007-02-06 US disclosed
US-20070004939-A1 Method for the continuous production of aldehydes VOLLAND MARTIN 2007-01-04 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20070004939-A1 Method for the continuous production of aldehydes HRH4, HRH2, HRH3 CYP1A2 157/4885CYP2A6 207/4885NPC1 2155/4885
US-20070083066-A1 Method for the production of 1,7-octadiene and use thereof CYP51A1, MSMO1, HSD17B7 CYP1A2 33/4885CYP2A6 57/4885NPC1 2542/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.