SCHEMBL13699

SCHEMBL13699

Cc1cc(SC(F)(F)F)ccc1OCCCN

nearest known ligand 0.41

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 2/20 0.41
ESR1 P03372 2/20 0.39
PPARD Q03181 4/20 0.37
NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.37
NFKB1 P19838 1/20 0.37
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.37
NFKB2 Q00653 1/20 0.37
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.37
RELA Q04206 1/20 0.37
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.37
PTPRZ1 P23471 1/20 0.36
HTR1B P28222 1/20 0.36
KDM4E B2RXH2 3/20 0.36
HTR2A P28223 3/20 0.36
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.36
TDP1 Q9NUW8 1/20 0.36
FFAR1 O14842 2/20 0.35
FFAR4 Q5NUL3 2/20 0.35
PPARG P37231 1/20 0.35
PPARA Q07869 1/20 0.35

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL14105 0.88 SMN1; SMN2 (0.41) SMN1; SMN2ESR1PPARDPTPRZ1HTR1B
SCHEMBL14850078 0.83 LMNA (0.39) SMN1; SMN2PPARDKMT2APTPRZ1HTR1B
SCHEMBL14850049 0.80 HTT (0.38) SMN1; SMN2PPARDL3MBTL1PTPRZ1HTR1B
SCHEMBL14037 0.78 ESR1 (0.49) ESR1PPARDKMT2AL3MBTL1KDM4E
SCHEMBL13949 0.75 SMN1; SMN2 (0.39) SMN1; SMN2PTPRZ1KDM4EHTR2AALDH1A1
SCHEMBL14853479 0.75 FFAR4 (0.54) ESR1PPARDFFAR1FFAR4PPARG
SCHEMBL6110605 0.74 SMN1; SMN2 (0.53) SMN1; SMN2ESR1NPC1NFKB1RAB9A
SCHEMBL165552 0.70 ESR1 (0.57) ESR1PPARDKMT2AL3MBTL1KDM4E
SCHEMBL900729 0.70 SMN1; SMN2 (0.49) SMN1; SMN2PTPRZ1KDM4EALDH1A1TDP1
SCHEMBL14850364 0.70 THRA (0.42) SMN1; SMN2PPARDKMT2APTPRZ1KDM4E

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-9845297-B2 Antimicrobial compounds and methods of making and using the same MELINTA THERAPEUTICS, INC. (US) 2017-12-19 US disclosed
US-20160031828-A1 ANTIMICROBIAL COMPOUNDS AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING THE SAME SILICON VALLEY BANK 2016-02-04 US disclosed
US-9216979-B2 Antimicrobial compounds and methods of making and using the same MELINTA THERAPEUTICS, INC. (US) 2015-12-22 US disclosed
US-20130090326-A1 Antimicrobial Compounds and Methods of Making and Using the Same RIB-X PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (US) 2013-04-11 US disclosed
WO-2011047323-A2 ANTIMICROBIAL COMPOUNDS AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING THE SAME RIB-X PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (US) 2011-04-21 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20130090326-A1 Antimicrobial Compounds and Methods of Making and Using the Same MPO, LPO, CAT SMN1; SMN2 3979/4885ESR1 4089/4885PPARD 1550/4885
US-20160031828-A1 ANTIMICROBIAL COMPOUNDS AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING THE SAME MPO, LPO, CAT SMN1; SMN2 3979/4885ESR1 4089/4885PPARD 1550/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.