SCHEMBL13699608

SCHEMBL13699608

CC(C)(C)OC(=O)COC(COCCOCCNC(=O)COC(COCCOCCN)COCCOCCN)COCCOCCNC(=O)COC(COCCOCCN)COCCOCCN

nearest known ligand 0.36

Predicted protein targets (top 8)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
APLNR P35414 1/20 0.36
TLR2 O60603 5/20 0.36
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.33
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.33
ADRB2 P07550 1/20 0.33
HTR1A P08908 1/20 0.33
CA2 P00918 1/20 0.31
KIF11 P52732 1/20 0.30

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL24864549 0.93 TLR2 (0.37) APLNRTLR2MEN1KMT2AADRB2
SCHEMBL3485998 0.89 APLNR (0.35) APLNRTLR2
SCHEMBL13699543 0.87 APLNR (0.36) APLNRTLR2MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL3484881 0.86 APLNR (0.34) APLNRTLR2MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL13699624 0.83 APLNR (0.33) APLNR
SCHEMBL13955336 0.79 TLR2 (0.34) TLR2MEN1KMT2AADRB2HTR1A
SCHEMBL24864545 0.79 APLNR (0.33) APLNRTLR2
SCHEMBL25028454 0.78 ADORA1 (0.35) TLR2CA2
SCHEMBL25028517 0.78 ADORA1 (0.35) TLR2CA2
SCHEMBL3485760 0.77 TLR2 (0.38) TLR2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20090240028-A1 Synthesis and Application of New Structural Well Defined Branched Polymers as Conjugating Agents for Peptides NOVO NORDISK A/S (DK) 2009-09-24 US disclosed
US-20090036353-A1 Insulin Derivatives Conjugated with Structurally Well Defined Branched Polymers NOVO NORDISK A/S (DK) 2009-02-05 US disclosed
US-20090036353-A1 Insulin Derivatives Conjugated with Structurally Well Defined Branched Polymers NOVO NORDISK A/S (DK) 2009-02-05 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090240028-A1 Synthesis and Application of New Structural Well Defined Branched Polymers as Conjugating Agents for Peptides VIP, PTMS, PDGFA APLNR 341/4885TLR2 3322/4885MEN1 1142/4885
US-20090036353-A1 Insulin Derivatives Conjugated with Structurally Well Defined Branched Polymers INSR, IAPP, IGF1R APLNR 771/4885TLR2 1081/4885MEN1 278/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.